Il 06/10/2015 23:23, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> We also should move the first one to the analysis library, so that the
> routines are accessible by plugins and processing framework Just
> another item on the TODO list!
sure, big improvement. better opening a ticket?
Giovanni, could you please
Il 06/10/2015 22:41, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
> BTW I think a little red cross on the corner of the welcome screen should be
> there. I couldn't find how to close it without opening an empty or a new
> project. When using "layer's menu from projec" to add layer to my empty
> session, welcome scr
Il 07/10/2015 07:59, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> I would suggest to wait until the freeze is over, and also until we
> have consensus on this. It takes a minute to change that, but it's a
> big change in terms of UI/UX, so better to be sure that we all agree
> on this
OK, ticket opened, not to forg
I would suggest to wait until the freeze is over, and also until we
have consensus on this. It takes a minute to change that, but it's a
big change in terms of UI/UX, so better to be sure that we all agree
on this
2015-10-07 7:47 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 07/10/2015 07:28, Victor Olaya ha
Il 07/10/2015 07:28, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> That sounds good to me
>
> Better to have all analysis tools under a single entry point.
Glad you like it. Also additional plugins could go here.
Radim, opinions? Juergen, I suppose the change, albeit trivial, is not
allowed by the freeze, right?
Al
That sounds good to me
Better to have all analysis tools under a single entry point.
2015-10-06 18:32 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser :
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Paolo Cavallini
> wrote:
>>
>> I suggest to make the two more uniform, e.g.:
>> * rename the Processing dropdown menu in Analysis (
On 7 October 2015 at 03:01, Hugo Mercier wrote:
>
> I've been using them very carefully, since I don't want to force
> anything and prefer to know the feelings about design / architecture of
> other devs before adding something. I consider this to be a good practice.
+1 on this - I also think it'
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 06. Oct 2015 at 17:02:19 +0100, Steve Pritchard wrote:
> When I open a QGIS project that has a layer using the Oracle provider, the
> provider queries for all of the features even though the display area only
> contains a few features:
> SELECT
> "GEOM","LOC_ID","LOC_LABEL","NA
On 7 October 2015 at 07:41, Régis Haubourg
wrote:
> Matthias Kuhn-2 wrote
>> Can you state more precisely what you mean with "on welcome screen"?
>> I.e. directly on the welcome screen or on a separate tab?
>
> Hi,
> At first thought, I would prefer directly on welcome screen, at least users
> get
On 7 October 2015 at 05:33, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
>> options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
>> Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged together?
>
>
> this is the classic example
On 06.10.2015 22:28, Salvatore Larosa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Giovanni Manghi
wrote:
Hi,
Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged
Matthias Kuhn-2 wrote
> Can you state more precisely what you mean with "on welcome screen"?
> I.e. directly on the welcome screen or on a separate tab?
Hi,
At first thought, I would prefer directly on welcome screen, at least users
get used to it (or addicted?). Notification icons are usefull fo
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Giovanni Manghi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
>> options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
>> Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged together?
>
>
> this is the classic exa
On 06.10.2015 20:33, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
Hi,
Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged together?
this is the classic example of bad redundancy
Hi,
> Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
> options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
> Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged together?
this is the classic example of bad redundancy we would need to remove
in QGIS. Not only w
Hello Devs!
I would like to kindly ask for help in importing any Python module for
reading HDF5 files on 64bit QGIS in Windows (OSGeo4W distribution).
I tried to use *h5py* and *pytables* binaries from [1]. There is no problem
with importing the modules in a Python session run from OSGeo Shell:
P
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> I suggest to make the two more uniform, e.g.:
> * rename the Processing dropdown menu in Analysis (this seems more in
> line with others: Web, Database, etc.)
> * add the commands now in the GRASS toolbar under the same menu
> (separated by
On 06.10.2015 18:05, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
I suppose I could replace the incomplete precision reduction
implementation with a hand-rolled snap-to-grid for now and wait for
GEOS 3.6. If there are no objections, I'll move on with thi
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> I suppose I could replace the incomplete precision reduction
> implementation with a hand-rolled snap-to-grid for now and wait for
> GEOS 3.6. If there are no objections, I'll move on with this this
> weekend.
Were you able to work on
When I open a QGIS project that has a layer using the Oracle provider, the
provider queries for all of the features even though the display area only
contains a few features:
SELECT
"GEOM","LOC_ID","LOC_LABEL","NAME","GRIDREF","LATITUDE","LONGITUDE","COUNTRY_CODE","IN_USE","REGION","PROTOCOL_ID","
Hi,
Probably I did not understand how a new addition to the code is supposed
to work ...
I received commit rights some times ago.
I've been using them very carefully, since I don't want to force
anything and prefer to know the feelings about design / architecture of
other devs before adding some
And a new video showing how to use a vector layer as a data source for
variables
https://vimeo.com/141546964
Cheers,
Michaël
2015-10-06 16:40 GMT+02:00 kimaidou :
> Hi all,
>
> I have just released the plugin Dynamic Layers which let you
>
> * configure a "dynamic datasource" for any layer with
Hi all,
I have just released the plugin Dynamic Layers which let you
* configure a "dynamic datasource" for any layer with variables. You can
use a syntax like {$myvar}
* Configure a table of variable values to use as replacements
* Use a vector layer as a source for this variables ( fields name
Hi Radim,
Il 06/10/2015 13:41, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> Which revision? Please use current master if possible.
I'm currently using Debian packages from our repo. Just upgraded.
> Please start with points and lines. When you digitize a point or line,
> nothing is displayed in canvas? Do you se
Hi all.
We currently have two major analytical tools:
* GRASS
* Processing.
The first has a toolbar and a panel, the second a dropdown menu and a
panel. The commands in the GRASS toolbar are mostly available in the
Browser and in the panel. I suggest to make the two more uniform, e.g.:
* rename
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>> yes - I tried, but the newly added polygon etc is not displayed once
>>> digitized. Oh, now I see: the custom grass symbology prevents me from
>>> seeing it. Once moved to single symbol, it is displayed.
>>
>>> I confirm an issue: I load a
Il 06/10/2015 13:29, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> I have added qgis.v.upgrade.py which runs
fine, I like that.
> but v.db.reconnect.all fails with -d even from GRASS shell:
here it worked well for a couple of locations.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
>>
>> >> There is v.build.all in modules.
>> >
>> > yes, but the user has no hint about its necessity; further steps:
>> > db.connect -d
>> > v.db.reconnect.all -cd
>> > are not available
28 matches
Mail list logo
