On 2016-01-04 20:22, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Apparently you're trying to install qgis-plugin-grass. As said the
qgis-plugin-grass only exists for distributions with GRASS6 and
apparently the
last GRASS6 in unstable was available when QGIS 2.8.2 was current.
deb http://qgis.org/debian-nightl
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 04. Jan 2016 at 09:29:53 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> deb http://qgis.org/debian-nightly-ltr sid main [0]
Apparently you're trying to install qgis-plugin-grass. As said the
qgis-plugin-grass only exists for distributions with GRASS6 and apparently the
last GRASS6 in unstable
Hi
I have read and I agree with the terms in the QGIS Contributor Guidelines
(http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Contributor_Guidelines). Thank you for inviting me
to the QGIS developers team.
Best regards
Sandro
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@li
On 4 January 2016 at 19:45, Alexander Bruy wrote:
> IMO it is much better to develop native TMS data provider.
> In this case 3rd party plugins will be able to add TMS layers
> as we already can do with WMS/WFS/etc. Also we will have
> same mechanism to deal with layer objects.
Another +1.
I've
+1 to that.
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 6:45 pm Alexander Bruy wrote:
> IMO it is much better to develop native TMS data provider.
> In this case 3rd party plugins will be able to add TMS layers
> as we already can do with WMS/WFS/etc. Also we will have
> same mechanism to deal with layer objects.
>
>
>
IMO it is much better to develop native TMS data provider.
In this case 3rd party plugins will be able to add TMS layers
as we already can do with WMS/WFS/etc. Also we will have
same mechanism to deal with layer objects.
2016-01-02 0:59 GMT+02:00 Victor Olaya :
> I like the idea of promoting the
Il 29/12/2015 22:06, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Tue, 29. Dec 2015 at 20:25:55 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply. I'm aware of this, that's why I used nightly both
>> for LTR and 2.13, but had no luck. Currently nightly-ltr wants to
>> install 2.8.2.
>
> I