Hi all
Here is my proposal to disrupt the quiet waters of project and map
layer registry classes:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/76
I should have time to work on the implementation during December...
Hopefully this will provide a good building block for the rewrite of
Il 23/10/2016 10:44, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> mmm, but Paolo's call already contains dtm*2, not dtm2. That's why i
> said that it looked correct to me.
AFAICT the syntax is of the type
dtm2=dtm*2
which I tested, and works. New description should help users, but the
command is still very cumberso
Il 23/10/2016 19:07, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> Something like this?
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/tests/README.md
Thanks Matthias. IMHO implementing a comprehensive set of tests is of
high priority, as well as fixing some crucial issues.
All the best.
--
Something like this?
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/tests/README.md
Matthias
On 23/10/16 14:20, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:00:59AM -0700, Tom Chadwin wrote:
>> http://www.opengis.ch/2016/02/04/increasing-the-stability-of-processing-alg
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:00:59AM -0700, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> http://www.opengis.ch/2016/02/04/increasing-the-stability-of-processing-algorithms/
Any chance to have an in-source-tree version of testcases writing
documentation ? Ideally reachable from README in the test directory...
Having easily
http://www.opengis.ch/2016/02/04/increasing-the-stability-of-processing-algorithms/
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-merge-in-processing-extent-tp5292052p5292123.html
Sent from the Quantu
Someone wrote a post about this a while ago - was it Matthias?
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-merge-in-processing-extent-tp5292052p5292122.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer ma
mmm, but Paolo's call already contains dtm*2, not dtm2. That's why i
said that it looked correct to me.
2016-10-23 7:46 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 23/10/2016 07:44, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
>
>> thanks for the clarification. Description improved in:
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/
