Plugin GB Elevation approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1366] GB Elevation 1.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GBElevation/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.or
Plugin PisteCreator approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1354] PisteCreator 1.3.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/PisteCreator/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https:
Plugin SentinelHub approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1370] SentinelHub 0.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SentinelHub/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/
Plugin SentinelHub approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1370] SentinelHub 0.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SentinelHub/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/
Plugin Vgi2Shp approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[500] Vgi2Shp 2.4" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Vgi2ShpConverter/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/list
That must have been a long time ago.
On 11/30/2017 12:40 PM, Borys Jurgiel wrote:
> PRs used to be overlooked ;) So I hope if anyone knows the hidden reason, he
> will say it here ;)
>
> Borys
>
> On czwartek, 30 listopada 2017 12:10:30 CET Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>> Hi Borys,
>>
>> I think it's s
Thank you Nyall, that makes sense.
It would be nice to have a tolerance parameter so that this very little
discrepancies can also be found, but I guess one could snap one geometry to
the other (with such little distance as tolerance) and then run intersects.
Regards,
Germán
2017-11-29 17:56 GMT
Hi Tim,
> You might want consider using the messaging framework we developed for
> InaSAFE. We used to use sphinx in the same way you do and struggled with it
> a) being very large to include in the plugin and b) requiring two separate
> translation workflows (Qt based and gettext based). The m
Hi Matteo
You might want consider using the messaging framework we developed for InaSAFE.
We used to use sphinx in the same way you do and struggled with it a) being
very large to include in the plugin and b) requiring two separate translation
workflows (Qt based and gettext based). The messagi
PRs used to be overlooked ;) So I hope if anyone knows the hidden reason, he
will say it here ;)
Borys
On czwartek, 30 listopada 2017 12:10:30 CET Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Borys,
>
> I think it's safe to directly open a pull request for this change ;)
>
> Matthias
___
Hi Borys,
I think it's safe to directly open a pull request for this change ;)
Matthias
On 11/30/2017 11:43 AM, Borys Jurgiel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am I right this tooltip is a common mistake or does it have a hidden meaning?
> :) Can I just remove it?
>
> https://issues.qgis.org/attachments/d
Hi All,
Am I right this tooltip is a common mistake or does it have a hidden meaning?
:) Can I just remove it?
https://issues.qgis.org/attachments/download/11772/newgeopackagelayer.png
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/17578
Regards,
Borys
___
QGIS-Dev
Hi Etienne and Nyall,
Indeed - removing the file "qgis_customwidgets.py" from
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/PyQt5/uic/widget-plugins brought the
Processing modeler back to normal!
Cool!
So now we at least do know that this is the culprit.
Thanks,
Andreas
On 2017-11-30 09:02, Etienne Trim
I got the problem too for many months even if it was disabled in the cmake.
I needed to remove the qgis_customwidgets.py in the site-package folder of
Python
Maybe a `locate qgis_customwidgets.py` might help?
2017-11-30 8:37 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann :
> Hi Nyall,
>
> I reverted 5dce8edb
>
> and
14 matches
Mail list logo
