Hi Nyall, all,
Il 30/01/2018 00:22, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> I don't think we can proceed with any 3.0 release while these two
> issues are unsolved.
>
> Thoughts?
I agree we should not release in case of very serious problems. The
points are: what is the threshold? Who decides?
IMHO is the r
On 30 January 2018 at 04:26, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> Next issue... translate.py uses QgsRasterFileWriter.driverForExtension().
> Perhaps I'm using this wrong, but is it outputting empty strings?
Confirmed - fixed by https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6216. Currently
it's only working for gdal drivers
Hi All,
I am an avid supporter to OTB and would love to see the plugin brought more in
line with latest developments in OTB. The binaries issue will always exist and
I believe OTB should support the same ones for which Qgis binaries are
available already. The other platforms should have a clear
Hi all,
I'd like to raise the idea of resurrecting the "blocker" tag on
redmine. I understand the reasons behind its original removal, and
fully agree that the new process is working much better.
BUT...
We have two extremely serious issues open against QGIS 3.0, which I
think SHOULD block the re
Next issue... translate.py uses QgsRasterFileWriter.driverForExtension().
Perhaps I'm using this wrong, but is it outputting empty strings?
Thanks
Tom
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.ht
> ... any chance this can be introduced as a dependency to fix things also
on standalone and avoid manual steps on OSGeo4W?
Hi Jürgen,
Following previous mail from Matthias, any chance to bundle networkx in
standalone app too?
Cheers,
Denis
___
QGIS-De
Possible attempted fix:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6208
Tom
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-
Il 29/01/2018 16:59, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
> (x-post to qgis-developer list)
>
> Hello all,
>
> Here is an RFComments for new otb plugin.
> https://gitlab.orfeo-toolbox.org/jmichel/otb/blob/790c2b7a5e3060d4e597d078c3c92e353a102773/.gitlab/issue_templates/request_for_comments.md
>
> Feel fr
I'm still having problems. In warp.py, line 198, the following is added as an
argument:
extentCrs.authid()
I've confirmed that extentCrs is a QgsCoordinateReferenceSystem. However,
authid() seems to be returning an empty string. I don't understand why.
Can anyone confirm?
Thanks
Tom
PS Code
(x-post to qgis-developer list)
Hello all,
Here is an RFComments for new otb plugin.
https://gitlab.orfeo-toolbox.org/jmichel/otb/blob/790c2b7a5e3060d4e597d078c3c92e353a102773/.gitlab/issue_templates/request_for_comments.md
Feel free to send your comments and suggestions
--
Regards,
Rashad
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:24 PM, G. Allegri wrote:
>
> What's your opinion
> ?
>
>
+
1 for me, as stated in the original thread https://lists.osgeo.org/
pipermail/qgis-developer/2018-January/051511.html
I think it will be good to unify the approaches.
Regards,
Anita
___
Thanks Nyall. It worked.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> On 27 January 2018 at 07:26, C Hamilton wrote:
> > I am working on making some of my QGIS plugin capabilities into
> processing
> > algorithms. When defining input parameter characteristics for the
> > GeoAlgorithm
I raise this topic with a new thread, because I think it's worth a
dedicated discussion.
Some questions were asked in another thread [1] about the status of
Processing scripts. It was noticed that the scripts are a "chimera", with a
special syntax and not very pythonic. The current implementation a
I'm trying to grab the pixels that intersect with my polygon shapefile and
apply transparency to them (that is, I'm trying to create a hole in my
raster)
For that, I get all the pixels that are in the footprint of the shapefile
in a list (see code below)
Then I used the QgsRasterTransparency.Tran
And when we create a new script from the toolbox, it's providing us a
python template more or less like this
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/algs/exampleprovider/ExampleAlgorithm.py
?
With some comments to help script writers, it will be nice, yes.
BTW, I just no
Rephrasing what I wrote before, what about dropping ScriptAlgorithm and
make ScriptAlgorithmProvider simply provide its algorithms from the special
scripts folder?
giovanni
2018-01-29 10:51 GMT+01:00 G. Allegri :
> Hi Anita,
> that's exactly what I also was thinking about. What about dropping
Hi Anita,
that's exactly what I also was thinking about. What about dropping scripts
in favour of "on the fly" QgsProcessingAlgorithms?
A single, unified, way of defining them, without the special parameters
syntax of scripts...
Giovanni
2018-01-29 9:55 GMT+01:00 Anita Graser :
> I've decided t
Il 25/01/2018 08:34, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> IMHO the name of the Versioning manu un DB Manager is not appropriate;
> in my view, this add a history to the table, rather than versioning
> (provided by more sophisticated plugins).
> This could be the time to change it in Q£. Any obje
Hi
My employer has a growing need for spatial ETL. A few examples of tasks:
- Pull adress data text files from FTP, process, validate and load into
PostGIS. This should be done every night.
- Pull data from a number of sources, process it, zip and and publish to
FTP. Also every night.
- Pull data
I've decided to go the algorithm provider plugin route for my scripts:
https://anitagraser.com/2018/01/28/porting-processing-scripts-to-qgis3/
But I'm also thinking of my students whom I want to show how to write tools
for QGIS. For many of them, it's their first contact with Python, so
starting a
Plugin go2streetview approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[481] go2streetview 8.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/go2streetview/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mai
Il 26/01/2018 08:43, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> Il 25/01/2018 20:39, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
>
>> id should still be unique for all current rows, shouldn't it?
>
> it should, but in the tests we have done it isn't: we end up having > 1
> record with the same id and NULL time_end. Apparen
22 matches
Mail list logo
