[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1456] EO Time Series Viewer approval notification.

Plugin EO Time Series Viewer approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1456] EO Time Series Viewer 0.5.201805141436" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/timeseriesviewerplugin/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server - SSL handshake failed for cascading WMS

Hello Régis, I did not yet try QGIS server 3.0 on Ubuntu yet (not clear to me how to install it, will look at it again). Thanks for pointing me to the problem described on https://issues.qgis.org/ issues/18634, however, it seems to be different from the SSL handshake problem: their server was

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server - SSL handshake failed for cascading WMS

And this: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/17951 and this too: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/16462 On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Anne, > did you test QGIS 3.0 also? > Could you create an issue in issue.qgis.org tracker? > > I found

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server - SSL handshake failed for cascading WMS

Hi Anne, did you test QGIS 3.0 also? Could you create an issue in issue.qgis.org tracker? I found that one, that seemed related https://issues.qgis.org/issues/18634 Regards, Régis 2018-05-14 16:25 GMT+02:00 Anne Blankert : > Hello List, > > This question was already

[QGIS-Developer] QGIS Server - SSL handshake failed for cascading WMS

Hello List, This question was already asked in Jan 2017, but no solution was posted. http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Server-SSL-handshake-failed-for- cascading-WMS-td5305094.html The problem: if QGIS uses an HTTPS (SSL) WMS service, the WMS works nicely in QGIS desktop. However, if you

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [87] Profile tool approval notification.

Plugin Profile tool approval by pcav. The plugin version "[87] Profile tool 4.1.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/profiletool/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Enum in Modeler

Hi all, testing the new Enum Input in the Processing Modeler I'm quite confused.. It seems now that if an algorithm has a Enum parameter (e.g. the Buffer has 2, "End cap style" and "Join style") and the user has not defined an Enum input, then it is possible to choose between the standard

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing 3.0 - porting guide

Thanks Nyall. May be worth adding to https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/Plugin-migration-to-QGIS-3 ? All the best. Il 11/05/2018 15:04, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Just a quick heads up - I've finally had the chance to finish off the > guide to porting Processing 2.x algorithms to 3.x