On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 03:38, Ismail Sunni wrote:
>
> Dear QGIS developers
>
> Here is my 3rd-week report for my GSoC Project. You can read this report
> better with image and GIF in the weekly report wiki [4]. You can also check
> the project wiki page [3]. Comments and suggestions are welcome
Thanks for the update Sunni!
Tim Sutton
Co-founder of Kartoza
Ex-QGIS project chairman
> On 16 Jun 2019, at 19:38, Ismail Sunni wrote:
>
> Dear QGIS developers
>
> Here is my 3rd-week report for my GSoC Project. You can read this report
> better with image and GIF in the weekly report
Hi Martin,
Thanks a lot. This is useful information to me.
Andreas
On 2019-06-17 12:11, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi Andreas
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Andreas Neumann wrote:
Now my question: will we run into problems because of these duplicated rule
keys? If this is a problem -
Got that, thanks! :)
Jonas
On 17.06.2019 14:03, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
Looks like it's approved
cheers
On 14.06.19 17:25, Jonas wrote:
ugins are approved? I totally understand that
the approval process is run by volunteers and if it just takes its time
thats perfectly fine! But i just
Looks like it's approved
cheers
On 14.06.19 17:25, Jonas wrote:
> ugins are approved? I totally understand that
> the approval process is run by volunteers and if it just takes its time
> thats perfectly fine! But i just want to make sure everything is OK and i
> didn't do something wrong or
Hi Stefan,
Yes, sure. If I were a bank or the national bank I would also mandate
use of SSL. Also, when personal data is involved. But many gov
authorities have primarily publically available geoinformation (object
data, no personal data) in their DBs and no sensitive data.
We are just
One of our customers (Swiss National Bank) mandates the use of SSL in their
internal LAN, even for DB connections.
Using anything but SSL is an insecure mode of communication, even in LAN.
RSA/DSA Accepted key-length is 2048 bit, recommended is 3072, ECC is 160 Bit,
recommended 256.
-
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 1:03 PM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hey all,
> sorry to intrude, but I have a bit of related information.
> GeoServer uses the same underlying stack as QGIS
>
Sorry not as QGIS, same as UDig!
Cheers
Andrea
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
Hey all,
sorry to intrude, but I have a bit of related information.
GeoServer uses the same underlying stack as QGIS, at one point we noticed
that the
reading performance went down, upon investigation it turned out the JDBC
driver
started using SSL by default when available.
So we added a flag to
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:11 PM Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> Wouldn't connection pooling be such a change. That certainly was
> introduced after.
Pooling was introduced to deal with multi-threaded rendering and
should not affect that. There always was a connection that was kept
alive while layer(s)
Wouldn't connection pooling be such a change. That certainly was
introduced after.
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe:
Hi Andreas
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Now my question: will we run into problems because of these duplicated rule
> keys? If this is a problem - why is QGIS not taking care about making the
> rule ids unique by generating new uuid keys on importing the qml
For the record, sending unencrypted data over a local network isn't safe as
soon as WIFI is part of said local network.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 17:02 Martin Dobias wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> >
> > The documentation currently promises "massive
Hi Matthias
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> The documentation currently promises "massive speed-ups in PostGIS layer
> rendering" with SSL disabled. [1]
>
> [...]
>
> Is there anyone who knows why this sentence was introduced? And if there
> is (still) an issue with
NICE!
-
Regards Morten
Currently using Qgis 2.18.23 (OSGeo4) and Qgis 3.4.2 in parallel
Windows 7, 64bit
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 19:12, magerlin wrote:
>
> The "Package Layers" Processing algorithm is a nice tool to pack and store a
> big project in one Geopackage.
>
> But I really miss, to have the styles saved in the Geopackage too - will it
> be possible?
It's your lucky day! (Well, lucky week).
The "Package Layers" Processing algorithm is a nice tool to pack and store a
big project in one Geopackage.
But I really miss, to have the styles saved in the Geopackage too - will it
be possible?
Regards Morten
-
Regards Morten
Currently using Qgis 2.18.23 (OSGeo4) and Qgis 3.4.2 in
Hi,
I would say, that the use of SSL should be encouraged if the connection
goes through public networks. If the Postgis connection is within the
company LAN I don't see a strong reason for enabling SSL, unless the
company LAN is designed in an "unsafe" way, or if sensitive data must be
hidden
18 matches
Mail list logo
