Hi,
And there's also QuickOSM plugin that I think provides this kind of feature.
Cheers,
Harrissou
Le 5 octobre 2019 07:22:10 GMT+02:00, Paolo Cavallini a
écrit :
>Hi Richard,
>
>
>On 05/10/19 04:36, Richard Marsden wrote:
>
>> Should I simply submit as say, v0.1, mark it experimental, and
*Hi QGIS users & developers !!!*
In layout, you can insert many maps (Add map), but only can be regular
polygons (square or rectangular), but when you want to create a special
presentation like a Tetris, you can't do it. The figures circle,
triangular, add polygon,... can't show maps inside them.
Hi Richard,
On 05/10/19 04:36, Richard Marsden wrote:
> Should I simply submit as say, v0.1, mark it experimental, and perhaps
> add some notes considering its early state. Or should I put it on
> Github (where it will also probably end up anyway) and announce it
> here? Or an alternative?
I
Hi Nyall,
On 05/10/19 03:11, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Ok, these are all valid concerns.
glad we all agree
> My original thinking was that we would use this tag for tickets which
> require extensive development (e.g. weeks of development), and
> accordingly are extremely unlikely to happen on a
Hi,
I'm currently working on my first plugin and intend to eventually
submit it to the official repository.
It would be good to have some people review it - testing and/or
looking at the code before it gets a wider audience.
Should I simply submit as say, v0.1, mark it experimental, and perhaps
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 22:42, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that's at least as difficult, because QGIS gives pretty much "free
> choice" on the bugfixing campaigns and individual devs choose, where they are
> most efficient in spending their time.
>
> Maybe it's best to keep the
Hi All
I am trying to configure a renderer with a marker line in python. Currently it
is killing QGIS with seg fault. Running recent dev build or 3.8.4 on ubuntu
18.04.
Below is the code I am running in python console which crashes QGIS. Any ideas
as to what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in
Hi
On 02/10/19 06:36, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Thanks Giovanni for the detailed reply.
>
> On 01/10/19 19:17, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
>>
>> Correct, but in the importing popup there is an option to transform
>> into single. It usually works, at least for points, so it's unclear
>> why
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> There is an arrow to the left of the line "***Segmentation fault" which
> uncollapses the trace
Is lack of source-level info expected ?
https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS/jobs/593389524#L3243-L3261
It sounds like a segfault on exit
There is an arrow to the left of the line "***Segmentation fault" which
uncollapses the trace
On 10/4/19 11:45 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I've handled to trigger a segfault during Travis test, but the
output does not contain a backtrace, while it looks like it
was intended to:
I've handled to trigger a segfault during Travis test, but the
output does not contain a backtrace, while it looks like it
was intended to:
https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS/jobs/593389524#L1770
Is this expected ?
--strk;
___
QGIS-Developer mailing
Hi Martin
On 04/10/19 10:08, Martin Landa wrote:
> I perfectly understand this point since I am doing volunteering work
> for the most of my professional life. This raises two
> questions/suggestions:
>
> * does need to be every new version really approved?
yes, for all non "trusted" authors
Hi Paolo,
pá 4. 10. 2019 v 9:46 odesílatel Paolo Cavallini napsal:
> checks as described in the plugin site page.
> please be patient: this is volunteer work, that relies on two people
> only, so we cannot always be very fast.
I perfectly understand this point since I am doing volunteering work
Hi Martin
On 04/10/19 09:37, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I thought that only new plugins need to be approved. Recently I
every version should be approved
> published new version of Gisquick plugin (2.0.1) and it's still not
> available. This means that also new versions of already
Hi all,
I thought that only new plugins need to be approved. Recently I
published new version of Gisquick plugin (2.0.1) and it's still not
available. This means that also new versions of already approved
plugin need to be approved. It's putting extra work on moderator's
shoulders. BTW, what is
Hola Francisco,
On 02/10/19 13:56, Fran Raga wrote:
>
> Recently I found out about this
> plugin https://github.com/qgist/toolbargenerator, which was presented in
> the FOSS4G 2019 Bucharest. What surprised me is that this plugin has
> EXACTLY the same functionality as mine, implemented for
Plugin Cost_surface_generalization approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1828] Cost_surface_generalization 0.1 Experimental" is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/cost_surface_generalization/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Plugin SPUGeo Memorial approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1570] SPUGeo Memorial 1.0 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/spugeomemorial/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
18 matches
Mail list logo
