Hi Matteo,
https://api.qgis.org/api/master/classQgsDatabaseQueryLog.html does have
appropriate signals (queryFinished and queryStarted, both include the
query) but it looks like they are not documented in the Python API
https://qgis.org/pyqgis/master/core/QgsDatabaseQueryLog.html
It *looks*
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 04. Mar 2024 at 17:51:56 +0100, Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer
wrote:
> I am wondering if there is a ubuntu (or debian) package repository available
> with a relatively new gdal, LERC and ZSTD support? Ideally a repo that can
> be added to Ubuntu 22.04
> Thank you if you
#osgeolive is a project of OSGeo dot org, and is part of the developer
chain that builds UbuntuGIS
https://live.osgeo.org
An experimental build of new GDAL and QGIS can be found here
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntugis-experimental/+packages
This is fresh-paint new
Hi devs,
I'm looking for a way in pyqgis to catch the (raw) queries that QGIS is
sending to the PostgreSQL provider when a table is edited: for example
the raw "INSERT ... INTO ...", "UPDATE ...".
Basically what the Development Panel is listing when enabled. Is there a
way in pyqgis?
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a ubuntu (or debian) package repository
available with a relatively new gdal, LERC and ZSTD support? Ideally a
repo that can be added to Ubuntu 22.04
I compiled things myself in the past, but it would be convenient for
docker containers to install from
Hello everyone,
I have noticed the following: if I have read and write access (DML) to a
PostgreSQL table, but no access to structure changes (DDL), then I can, for
example, add new columns with the field calculator and fill them with results.
Everything seems to run normally, I do not get a
Hi,
Calling get() means that you get a reference of the QgsAbstractGeometry used by
the
QgsGeometry object, but the QgsGeometry object (g) is still the
ownership of the QgsAbstractGeometry object (g_geom).
So, if you delete your QgsGeometry (g) you delete the owned
QgsAbstractGeometry
Hi Denis,
And thank you for this work!
Regards,
Julien
> Dear all,
>
> You might have noticed heavy traffic for the last 24h on the Github actions.
>
> There was an issue in the former workflow and I took the opportunity to clean
> up the situation.
>
> I have moved to upstream save cache
