For me it's perfectly fine if the PSC member calls for the nominations.
I prefer the nominations to be public, for the reason Jorge mentioned:
encouraging more people to make nominations.
But first of all, I'd organize voting for nominated candidates instead of just
counting private
For me it's perfectly fine if the PSC member calls for the nominations.
I prefer the nominations to be public, for the reason Jorge mentioned:
encouraging more people to make nominations.
But first of all, I'd organize voting for nominated candidates instead of just
counting private
Hi Paolo,
I don't see this process as a problem, but as an opportunity to build a
better community. That's why this process exist, to recognize and reward
the most dedicated members.
I would put the question in the other way: why can't we make the
nominations public from the start? Is it a
Hi all,
so are you suggesting that:
* the call for nominations should be done by a non PSC member (now it's
a PSC member doing this)
* make nominations public from the start (we currently disclose them
after collecting them).
For the first one I frankly don't see any issue.
For the second one,
