Hi all,
I just realized this mail wasn't sent publicly. Here is a follow up on the
documentation bot.
Le ven. 10 janv. 2020 à 16:42, Denis Rouzaud a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a quick follow-up:
>
> * When the PR is created or labeled as Needs Documentation, a comment is
> left to tell the
Hi Matthias
Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 09:14, Matthias Kuhn a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Thanks a lot for this Denis. Having the technical base system for this set
> up is a good step forward!
>
> The biggest advantage of this itself is the direct *link from the
> documentation issue to the pull request*
Hi Alexander,
Unless you have examples of how unfriendly the documentation process *IS*
for developers, I ask you to stop these personal attacks. This is the
second time in a month you raise this comment to justify why you no longer
contribute to docs. If you cannot or do not want, it's up to
Hi Denis
Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 06:24, Denis Rouzaud a
écrit :
> Hi Harrissou,
>
> No worries, I have been more focused on technical matters up to now, but I
> was indeed expecting some room for improvements. There was a bit of a
> stress to provide reports for the grant proposal, but it was
Hi
Thanks a lot for this Denis. Having the technical base system for this
set up is a good step forward!
The biggest advantage of this itself is the direct *link from the
documentation issue to the pull request* (instead of a commit message as
previously).
I think instead of trying to
вт, 7 січ. 2020 о 05:36 Nyall Dawson пише:
> documentation issues queue, which keeps hassling the PR submitter
> every xx weeks until the corresponding documentation ticket is closed.
> ("Hey, you still haven't added the required documentation for your
> feature. This isn't playing nice with
Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 04:36, Nyall Dawson a
écrit :
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 11:59, DelazJ wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks Denis for the work.
> > I might be missing some key points because comparing the generated
> reports from the two systems, I'm sorry I feel like it's instead a
>
Hi Harrissou,
No worries, I have been more focused on technical matters up to now, but I
was indeed expecting some room for improvements. There was a bit of a
stress to provide reports for the grant proposal, but it was clearly a call
for discussion, sorry not to state it clearly.
Le mar. 7
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 11:59, DelazJ wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks Denis for the work.
> I might be missing some key points because comparing the generated reports
> from the two systems, I'm sorry I feel like it's instead a regression. Alow
> me to explain:
>
> 1. For the same feature merged in
Hi all,
Thanks Denis for the work.
I might be missing some key points because comparing the generated reports
from the two systems, I'm sorry I feel like it's instead a regression. Alow
me to explain:
1. For the same feature merged in the code, see old system report [0] vs
new system's [1]. From
10 matches
Mail list logo
