Hi Matthias,
On Tue, 14. Aug 2018 at 11:21:38 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> * Disable the stack when pdb are not installed
> * Add some guidelines on issue reporting (as stated by Jonathan)
> * Allow opening a new ticket and searching for identical reports to link to
* Disable submission if
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 19:01, Jonathan Moules
wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
>
> Looking at this from another angle (and being aware I know nothing of
> the QGIS code-base) - to me at least that would suggest that maybe it's
> worth improving the crash dumps so that they're better able to be used
> as a
On 08/14/2018 11:21 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can a new state "feedback required" be introduced (emphasis on
> required) which then can be closed automatically if no feedback is
> provided? This state would be set by humans when it's clear at the
> time of setting the state that
> I agree in general, but there's a lot of tickets recently with just a
> crash dump (with no clues in the dump) and no further info about how
> to reproduce the crash or what triggered it. These reports don't have
> *any* value on their own.
>
> Nyall
By the way, since log we have also a
Hi all,
Can a new state "feedback required" be introduced (emphasis on required)
which then can be closed automatically if no feedback is provided? This
state would be set by humans when it's clear at the time of setting the
state that the ticked not only *would like to have* but actually *does
Hi Nyall,
Looking at this from another angle (and being aware I know nothing of
the QGIS code-base) - to me at least that would suggest that maybe it's
worth improving the crash dumps so that they're better able to be used
as a stand-alone debugging thing that doesn't require user
On 08/14/2018 02:23 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 18:11, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> I agree, better be conservative. Furthermore, not always lack of feedback
>> means an issue is not valid. I'd be against automatically closing the issues
>> without further verification.
> I
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 18:11, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
> I agree, better be conservative. Furthermore, not always lack of feedback
> means an issue is not valid. I'd be against automatically closing the issues
> without further verification.
I agree in general, but there's a lot of tickets
> Gosh, 258 waiting for feedback!
>
> I'll have a look during the HF, thanks.
what is the surprise here? is a "normal" number for our bug tracker,
and in fact I usually use the dev meetings as occasion to make large
cleanups of the tickets in feedback status.
-- G --
Gosh, 258 waiting for feedback!
I'll have a look during the HF, thanks.
On 08/13/2018 11:13 AM, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
> I agree with 30 days, Paolo the feedbak filter is already
> available https://issues.qgis.org/projects/qgis/issues?query_id=112
>
> Luigi Pirelli
>
>
I agree with 30 days, Paolo the feedbak filter is already available
https://issues.qgis.org/projects/qgis/issues?query_id=112
Luigi Pirelli
**
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
*
> What's an "acceptable" amount of time between adding a question to a
> ticket/marking as "feedback" before closing that issue as "Closed due
> to lack of feedback"?
>
> Is 14 days sufficient?
Hi Nyall,
the official number is 15 days, but in reality in my personal effort
to keep the tracker
I agree, better be conservative. Furthermore, not always lack of
feedback means an issue is not valid. I'd be against automatically
closing the issues without further verification.
I'm available to help checking, maybe creating a view of tickets needing
a check could be useful.
All the best.
I would suggest 30 days, people might be so lucky to have their holidays
last longer than two weeks.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> Quick question re closing issues on redmine:
>
> What's an "acceptable" amount of time between adding a question to a
> ticket/marking as
Quick question re closing issues on redmine:
What's an "acceptable" amount of time between adding a question to a
ticket/marking as "feedback" before closing that issue as "Closed due
to lack of feedback"?
Is 14 days sufficient?
Nyall
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
