Hi,
Le lun. 3 juin 2019 à 15:45, Alessandro Pasotti a
écrit :
>
> Looks good!
>
> Do we have web page with more information where we can point the users to?
>
> Afaict, no! Nothing on our official web site. And this would address, if I
correctly understand what's being said,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:36 PM Martin Dobias wrote:
> Hi Nyall
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:28 AM Nyall Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I figure it's an accurate reflection of the situation. A feature
> > request older than this will likely NEVER get implemented without
> > funding. If we don't
Hi Nyall
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:28 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> Well, I figure it's an accurate reflection of the situation. A feature
> request older than this will likely NEVER get implemented without
> funding. If we don't go for a specific label, I'd suggest we make the
> bot message say
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 18:00, Martin Dobias wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:10 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to see the stale bot used for ALL issues too eventually - but
> > the timeout could be much longer for these than for pull requests.
> > E.g. 1 month for
Hi Nyall
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:10 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> I'd like to see the stale bot used for ALL issues too eventually - but
> the timeout could be much longer for these than for pull requests.
> E.g. 1 month for issues with the feedback flag, 3 months for
> non-feedback flagged
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 22:32, Martin Dobias wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Thanks again for all the efforts to migrate tickets to github - having
> a single platform makes things easier.
>
> Going through some of the tickets, I realize we have lots of tickets
> in feedback state (nearly 400 at this
Hi all
Thanks again for all the efforts to migrate tickets to github - having
a single platform makes things easier.
Going through some of the tickets, I realize we have lots of tickets
in feedback state (nearly 400 at this point). My feeling is that
there's relatively small chance of getting
