Thanks Nyall!
Le dim. 4 nov. 2018 à 19:01, Nyall Dawson a écrit :
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 19:32, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > On Wed, 24. Oct 2018 at 22:52:06 +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> > > To me would be a +1 but probably, would be nice to get Jef opinion?
> >
> >
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 19:32, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Wed, 24. Oct 2018 at 22:52:06 +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> > To me would be a +1 but probably, would be nice to get Jef opinion?
>
> I don't have anything to add - dropping xenial support after 3.4 is fine with
> me.
Hi Marco,
On Wed, 24. Oct 2018 at 22:52:06 +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> To me would be a +1 but probably, would be nice to get Jef opinion?
I don't have anything to add - dropping xenial support after 3.4 is fine with
me.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH
I think nobody objected, we can go ahead.
Cheers.
Il 3 novembre 2018 01:32:09 CET, Denis Rouzaud ha
scritto:
>Hi all,
>
>Is this an agreement?
>Can we bump to 5.9?
>
>Denis
>
>Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 à 16:52, Marco Bernasocchi a
>écrit :
>
>> Hi Nyall (Ubuntu user here),
>>
>> regarding ubuntu
Hi all,
Is this an agreement?
Can we bump to 5.9?
Denis
Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 à 16:52, Marco Bernasocchi a écrit :
> Hi Nyall (Ubuntu user here),
>
> regarding ubuntu 16, I think it's negligible, it is not the latest LTS
> anymore it is scheduled for EOL in april 2021 and QGIS 3.4 is planned
Hi Nyall (Ubuntu user here),
regarding ubuntu 16, I think it's negligible, it is not the latest LTS
anymore it is scheduled for EOL in april 2021 and QGIS 3.4 is planned to
be in LTR until February 2020. so if somebody wants/has to to stick with
a 5yo OS, I guess it should be ok in staying one
Hi list,
I'm wondering if we can bump the minimum Qt version for QGIS 3.6 to
something more modern, e.g. Qt 5.9.
The current minimum of 5.4/5.5 (no-one knows which it actually is!) is
very old, and very buggy. (See discussion at
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/8265). The sooner we can drop
