Hi,
As far as I remember, sphinx is based/expands "normal" RST introducing new
directives, so it should be normal that some seems to be missing when you
try to parse them using a rst parser.
Alexandre Neto
A quarta, 31/03/2021, 14:11, DelazJ escreveu:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I can't answer whether
Hi Jonathan,
I can't answer whether there's any particular RST flavour behind. What I
know is that we rely on Sphinx [0] and most of the rules/syntaxes we use
are picked from them. The docs guidelines [1] also provide some explanation
on the choice made.
So, in the Sphinx docs, you can find :ref:
Hi List,
What flavour is the RST behind the QGIS docs? There are quite a few
things in here that are syntax erroring all the parsers I'm trying and
aren't in the basic RST spec either
(https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/cheatsheet.txt).
For example using ":ref:" for internal hyper
