On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 22:26, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)
wrote:
>
> May I support this request by Matteo?
> When processing geometries, undesired multi-geometries are a frequent
> outcome. It may even be useful to show the users that that the procedure has
> a multi-geometry output. This
Hi Ginetto,
> add in a model preceding with "promote to multipart" or "multiparts to
> singleparts" ?
this will not solve the problem actually. Or better, not upstream :)
Matteo
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
add in a model preceding with "promote to multipart" or "multiparts to
singleparts" ?
Luigi Pirelli
**
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange:
May I support this request by Matteo?
When processing geometries, undesired multi-geometries are a frequent
outcome. It may even be useful to show the users that that the procedure
has a multi-geometry output. This usually means there are uplanned outcomes
and that the algorithm is not properly
Hi devs,
if I'm not wrong Processing script input combobox can filter some vector
types [0] but does not distinguish between single and multi geometries.
I think this could be useful to add. I faced a problem where an
algorithm could not run with multipoint geometries, but I had to filter
them
