Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Hi, On Tue, 22. Aug 2017 at 10:41:33 +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > I added signing for the weekly yesterday. Requires wine and in turn xvfb - > because we need to produce an extra installer that installs an uninstaller, so > we can sign it and include it in the actual installer - runs fine

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Il 23/08/2017 20:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto: > Hi > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Neumann, Andreas > wrote: > > Hi Jürgen, > > Thanks a lot for the explanations, your work and efforts around > signing and fixing the weeklies! >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Hi On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Thanks a lot for the explanations, your work and efforts around signing > and fixing the weeklies! > ​+1 - its really great that you did this, thanks Jürgen! Regards Tim​ > Another step in

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Hi Jürgen, Thanks a lot for the explanations, your work and efforts around signing and fixing the weeklies! Another step in order to make QGIS more professional. Andreas On 2017-08-22 10:41, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Tue, 22. Aug 2017 at 09:39:48 +0200, Neumann,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Hi Andreas, On Tue, 22. Aug 2017 at 09:39:48 +0200, Neumann, Andreas wrote: > I noticed that the Windows all-in-one installers are now signed (Open > Source Geospatial Foundation). Is 2.18.12 the first signed version or > were the previous versions also signed? Yes, it's the first one. > In

[QGIS-Developer] Question on signed windows installers

Hi Jürgen, I noticed that the Windows all-in-one installers are now signed (Open Source Geospatial Foundation). Is 2.18.12 the first signed version or were the previous versions also signed? In any case - wanted to report back that our AV scanner did not complain about 2.18.12, whereas it