We only update our LTR at most every 6 months and for some they are still
using quite old versions. The only reason we might want something updated
sooner would be if there were a bug that someone had encountered.
Regards,
Calvin
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:47 AM Saber Razmjooei via QGIS-Developer
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for raising this issue.
>From our experience with various large organizations, they generally skip
most of the minor releases. But for those who fund a specific bug fix, they
will immediately upgrade to the latest LTR as soon as the fix appears in
the release.
So, having the
Hi,
Like that other decision - that was a bit hard to find (you helped me
find it in QEP 239) - I don't know exactly where the quarantine rule
originated. I am pretty sure there was discussion.
Nyall: can you please share some background when and why it was
introduced and if this decision
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 28. Feb 2023 at 08:55:49 +0100, Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer
wrote:
> However, the situation is, that there is also a "quarantine rule" - which
> is not mentioned in QEP 239 - but it helps to prevent untested patches to
> end up in LTR versions, by delaying the
Hello,
I just wanted to share my thoughts from the users-perspective:
Whenever there is a LTR-Version of a software I use that for production
environments. For QGIS however, I always have both the LTR and the
current version installed. The reason for this is my personal experience
with bug
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 17:56, Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer
wrote:
>
> Dear QGIS devs,
>
> The QGIS release schedule for LTR versions was recently "thinned out", as
> part of a decision to introduce "manual testing" prior to release - see QEP
> 239:
Dear QGIS devs,
The QGIS release schedule for LTR versions was recently "thinned out", as
part of a decision to introduce "manual testing" prior to release - see QEP
239: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/239 - see
also the release schedule at
