Hello fellow QGIS devs!
I had a PR pending in the QGIS repository but unfortunately, the Stale Bot
closed it due to inactivity:
#41906
Custom Label checkbox in the Legend Item Properties (fixes #41384)
Can a commiter re-open it please?
Thank you!
--
Sent from:
I agree with Jorge and am personally not a fan of a simple "pay a
commercial partner" message, which is why I think a separate link like
Matthias suggested is a great idea, and any message which might be
interpreted as "It's open source, so fix it yourself" could be harmful.
I think a large part
Hi,
I have a different opinion on this. We should emphasis the community
component of our QGIS open source project. Just asking to pay if they
want the issue solved, is what any commercial software project does. It
does not help to create new contributors.
Reporting and working on issues is
I am not a fan of a bugtracker pushing people to sponsored development
by spamming each issue with it. It's perfectly reasonable to assign a
label that means basically "this issue appears legitimate but no one has
expressed interest in working on it", and make the pointer to either 1)
maybe you
github.io/>
-
The essential is invisible to the eye. Saint-Exupéry
From: QGIS-Developer On Behalf Of
Charles Dixon-Paver
Sent: 08 January 2021 07:44
To: Alexandre Neto
Cc: qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Stale bot and older requests/issue
How about something like:
Unfortunately this issue has not been addressed by the QGIS community for
some time. If you would like to expedite the resolution of this issue and
more like it, please refer to the https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/facilitation.html;>facilitating
development guide
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:44 PM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> What I'm trying to convey here is that there's a chance the ticket
> will be addressed without sponsorship, but if they DO sponsor it will
> get addressed immediately. So "fast track" here means something a
> little like "short cut". Is
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 09:25, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>
> As an user and member of a user group, the message does not offend at all.
> This is something we struggle to explain to users and it's a good opportunity
> to send the message.
>
> I prefer a long version instead of just a link (many
As an user and member of a user group, the message does not offend at all.
This is something we struggle to explain to users and it's a good
opportunity to send the message.
I prefer a long version instead of just a link (many won't click on it)
I am not a native english speaker, but I think
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 07. Jan 2021 at 12:55:22 +, Stefan Steiger wrote:
> Also, if you use commercial software,
you probably meant to say proprietary software - as you correctly said free
software is not required to be free of charge and hence can be commercial too.
> As with plugins:
> As
.
>
> As long as you only use it internally (e.g. on a WebServer), you don’t
> have to abide by the terms of the GPL (the Affero
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License>/Application-Service-Provider
> loophole).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Q
> I've a small request to consider for stale bot and issues/feature
> requests. I think that if a ticket remains open for say > 90 days
> since the last comment, it would be nice if stale bot added a comment
> like:
>
> "Unfortunately this bug/feature request has not seen any solution in
> the
10:10
An: Matthias Kuhn
Cc: qgis-developer
Betreff: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Stale bot and older requests/issues - possible
enhancement
Hi
As a user and employee of a French administration, I think what is proposed
would be an excellent reminder. Open source is not free.
Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 09
Hi
As a user and employee of a French administration, I think what is
proposed would be an excellent reminder. Open source is not free.
Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 09:33, Matthias Kuhn a écrit :
> Hi Nyall,
>
> I would also appreciate a hint like this.
> Maybe it could be done even more subtle by
Hi Nyall,
I would also appreciate a hint like this.
Maybe it could be done even more subtle by shortening this text and adding
a link to a page "learn how to make things progress"?
I'd also very much appreciate the voices of users on this topic (that's a
classical "we don't only want to hear the
Hi list,
I've a small request to consider for stale bot and issues/feature
requests. I think that if a ticket remains open for say > 90 days
since the last comment, it would be nice if stale bot added a comment
like:
"Unfortunately this bug/feature request has not seen any solution in
the recent
) G1H 6R1
Téléphone : 418 627-8669, poste 4304
jean-francois.bour...@mffp.gouv.qc.ca
mffp.gouv.qc.ca
-Message d'origine-
De : QGIS-Developer De la part de
Karsten Tebling
Envoyé : 4 janvier 2021 02:40
À : Nyall Dawson
Cc : qgis-developer
Objet : Re: [QGIS-Developer] stale bot
Am 22.12.2020 um 23:23 schrieb Nyall Dawson:
That sounds ideal, but unfortunately things just don't work that way.
If your bug report is not reproducible there's a very low chance it
will get fixed.
So if you want your bug fixed, the motivation sits with you to make it
as easy as possible for
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 08:58, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 08:23:55AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> > It's actually in place to avoid frustration
> > caused by the "I submitted this ticket 12 months ago, why has nothing
> > been done?!?!?" situation.
>
> To be honest, I
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 08:23:55AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> It's actually in place to avoid frustration
> caused by the "I submitted this ticket 12 months ago, why has nothing
> been done?!?!?" situation.
To be honest, I always find these stale bots more frustrating:
"I submitted this
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 00:14, Karsten Tebling wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> could you tell me what is considered weed? In most cases I can't provide
> sample data because I do not own the data or a coworker had the crash
> and "only" saved the report details.
>
> In the "QGIS unexpectedly ended"-dialog
This one slipped through the cracks of a notoriously understaffed pull
request review team. Sorry for that. I just reopened it, since it looks
reasonable.
If you run into this again, please ask what can be done to continue with
the pull request, a comment will show your interest, likely attract
>
> That's odd to hear as I had one marked stale that had a PR attached
>
There was some initial glitch, but I think Matthias already fixed it.
And to answer Richard: each ticket that will be labeled as stale will
be manually reviewed (by me for sure) and if it needs to stay open
(and the
Actually it was the PR itself that was closed -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/39231
Ian
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 14:54, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Can you share a link to this issue?
>
> Thanks
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ian Turton wrote:
>
>> That's odd to hear
Hi Ian,
Can you share a link to this issue?
Thanks
Matthias
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ian Turton wrote:
> That's odd to hear as I had one marked stale that had a PR attached
>
> Ian
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Sorry if it was a bit a
That's odd to hear as I had one marked stale that had a PR attached
Ian
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry if it was a bit a rough start!
> The stale bot specifically picks only issues which are left with the
> "feedback" label.
> This was the case with
Hello,
could you tell me what is considered weed? In most cases I can't provide
sample data because I do not own the data or a coworker had the crash
and "only" saved the report details.
In the "QGIS unexpectedly ended"-dialog it reads "You can also send us a
helpful bug report using the
Hi Richard,
Sorry if it was a bit a rough start!
The stale bot specifically picks only issues which are left with the
"feedback" label.
This was the case with these two issues. I notice Giovanni already fixed
this.
The assumption is that the veggies don't have open questions on them and
this way
I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of feedback",
but I think current 'stale bot implementation' is a little rude on the edges.
(did I miss some discussion about this here?)
I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of feedback", only
because I commented
29 matches
Mail list logo
