Anita,
Le samedi 17 octobre 2015, 19:22:21 Anita Graser a écrit :
> What's the intended order? Newest first?
> Would be good to have a note at the top imho.
Yes newest first, I will add a note today.
Thanks,
Y.
--
Yves Jacolin
___
Qgis-developer mail
On Oct 17, 2015 4:39 PM, "Yves Jacolin" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Anybody wants to review my Pull Request to check that I didn't forget some
> books?
>
> DO you think that the structure is the good one, may be there is a more
formal
> way to list books.
What's the intended order? Newest first?
Would
Hello,
Anybody wants to review my Pull Request to check that I didn't forget some
books?
DO you think that the structure is the good one, may be there is a more formal
way to list books.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/285/files
Thanks,
Y.
Yves JacolinLe mardi 13 octobre 2015, 21:
Andreas,
+1 for a book section
Otto,
I believe the answer to your original question, "why it seems to be
attractive to write about QGIS there (in books) and not within the project
(oficial doxumentation)?", is given by the early testimony. Writting good
updated documentation takes lots of time,
Hello,
Here is a first draft of PR: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/285
Feedbacks are welcome :)
Y.
Le mardi 13 octobre 2015, 22:31:23 Nathan Woodrow a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I do feel for people who try and write books given the pace of QGIS, I
> write the training manuals for my employer
Hi,
I do feel for people who try and write books given the pace of QGIS, I
write the training manuals for my employer so I know what it feels like,
however, this is just the world we live in and a fact of software. I have
tons of books on bookshelf that are outdated, new programming books come
ou
Hi,
In the context of our release discussion I am forwarding the perspective
of an educator and book author - just posted to the QGIS community
mailing list. See forwarded mail.
I understand it must be a nightmare to teach, document and write books
on QGIS at the current pace.
I hope that
