On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:29:08PM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
A bit of an update on how this is progressing:
I got reasonably close to cherry picking a large number of commits from
master which apply to the 2.0 branch. Originally, I'd included any fixes
which were applicable, including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I guess if you have committed the fixes to the release-2_0 branch they
will be taken anyway ..
I am going to commit some german updates as well in that release branch ..
(I think that's what the release branch is meant for)
regards
Werner
On
It's fine for us that control the hardware we run stuff on but a lot of
people don't and have to go though a major process to get an update.
To that end, would it be possible to create an update that's more like a
patch of the sort that Windows, ArcGIS, most-games use, rather than (or
maybe
I have experimented with a couple of binary patch making tools, never could
get any of them to really work but that is a good idea if someone has the
skills.
- Nathan
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk wrote:
It's fine for us that control the
Seems like a positive response all round, I'll get started...
Do you have a plan about how to make sure, that the fixes did not
introduce any regressions as side-effect?
My plans are to push any bug fix only (no new features) commits across, but
to exclude:
- Any processing related commits
On 2 November 2013 10:30, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
My plans are to push any bug fix only (no new features) commits across,
but to exclude:
- Any processing related commits (since that's been updated via the plugin
mechanism)
- Any specific packaging related commits (I'm
Hi Nyall,
I will happly release updated Packages for Fedora in my own Repo and I'm
sure they will also be packaged for the official repository in Fedora 20.
I am in favor of this plan. But the most heavily requested packages will
probably be Ubuntu + OS X + Windows. So it would be nice to
Sure, I'll package for OS X.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Hi Nyall,
I will happly release updated Packages for Fedora in my own Repo and I'm
sure they will also be packaged for the official repository in Fedora 20.
I am in favor of this plan. But the most heavily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/10/2013 23:21, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
I'm happy to apply all the bug fixes, but packaging isn't in my skillset!
Hi Nyall,
thanks for your offer, very interesting. Of course packagers will have to bear
much
of the burden of a new release, so
+1
I was going to ask if there were plans for something like this, but it's
great to see someone taking the initiative on it!
On 29 October 2013 22:21, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm just scoping things out -- if I was to go through all the commits
which have hit
Hey all,
I'm just scoping things out -- if I was to go through all the commits which
have hit master since the 2.0 release and apply any relevant bug fixes to
the release-2_0 branch, what's the chance of getting this packaged up and
released as a 2.0 point release?
I'm happy to apply all the bug
11 matches
Mail list logo
