Folks,
with all due respect, it cannot fit in my head HOW can you shut down
a mean of communication that was used for 5000 people and continues to
be used.
Don't mention spam, slowness, login pecularities, hosting - these
are all minor technical issues, fixable.
How can you divert all
Hi
Just my 2c:
- +1 for moving wiki into redmin if Otto is agreeable
- Regarding joomla logins - we dont really encourage community logins
/ commenting on posts etc on the joomla site so I would not worry
about spending time on it (for ldap integration I mean). Ultimately I
would like to discard
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:50:54 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
Just my 2c:
- +1 for moving wiki into redmin if Otto is agreeable
+1
- Regarding joomla logins - we dont really encourage community logins
/ commenting on posts etc on the joomla site so I would not worry
about spending time on it
Hi,
I agree, we need a simple infrastructure with only a few applications to
maintain. I like the ideas to
- move the wiki to redmin
- make the forums read only and ask users to post to stack exchange
- keep Joomla as it is and migrate to Django in the future. We don't
need ldap integration
One comment I came across today on the forum:
but THANK YOU A LOT.
This forum has made getting into QGIS easier. As soon as i can
contribute with help myself, i will do so
I am impartial, but we need to think carefully before shutting it down.
Cheers
Saber
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 09:47 +0200,
Marco thinks that the community members who take care of the forum could
decide such a change. But it is always possible to send a mail to the PSC list
and ask for their view. Since Gary didn't step into the discussion and it's
his forum, I would suggest that Anita sends a mail to the PSC list.
Il 05/07/2011 11:26, Pirmin Kalberer ha scritto:
I've played a bit with gis.stackexchange and think it's really a good idea to
use it.
Instead of forum.qgis.org we could use
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/qgis
as starting point.
+1 for me.
IMHO there is no realistic
Is this something that should be decided by the PSC or rather by the
community? I guess only Gary can shut the forum down or turn it read-only.
Regards,
Anita
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.itwrote:
Il 05/07/2011 11:26, Pirmin Kalberer ha scritto:
I've
Anita, Carson, Jean Roc,
I'm replying from the Nabble qgis-developer forum now...
Anita Graser wrote:
Some forum users are already cross-posting on gis.stackexchange. Maybe
that
would be a solution.
I support using gis.stackexchange instead of phpBB forum as well. It does
not fullfill
Il giorno mar, 28/06/2011 alle 00.20 -0700, Pirmin Kalberer ha scritto:
gis.stackechange at least adds some quality to an old-school forum. I like
especially that you don't have to create another account and can login with
OpenID instead.
Good point. I do not like (nobody likes it, I guess)
Am Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:16:04 +0200
schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il giorno mar, 28/06/2011 alle 09.38 +0200, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Good point. I do not like (nobody likes it, I guess) having I do not
know how many IDs to access the various parts of QGIS infrastructure
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, um 12.21:21 schrieb Otto Dassau:
Am Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:16:04 +0200
schrieb Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il giorno mar, 28/06/2011 alle 09.38 +0200, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Good point. I do not like (nobody likes it, I guess) having I do not
+1 for moving to redmine for wiki. Having everything in one place would be
a good thing, less logins; one syntax; good time to clean up dead links and
old info; etc etc
- Nathan
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Pirmin Kalberer pi...@sourcepole.comwrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, um 12.21:21
Il giorno mar, 28/06/2011 alle 12.37 +0200, Pirmin Kalberer ha scritto:
Disadvantages:
-Different Wiki Syntax
-Some Media wiki features will be missing (Tab menu?, Categories?, HTML
embedding?, What links here?, Maintenance reports?)
Thanks Pirmin for the analysis. IMHO the only serious
14 matches
Mail list logo
