Marco wrote:
There will always be problems at some point if the layers / map CRS are not
properly set. I just want to avoid more complications compared to the current
situation if this is not the case ( because it happens so frequently in
practice ).
Agreed, even (apparently) simple changes
Il giorno mar, 11/01/2011 alle 00.43 +0100, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
Ideally if all the data from government is in the same CRS, no
reprojecting will happen - because the project CRS will be the same as
the CRS of individual layers (thus no warning would be issued).
The problem here is that
Hi!
definitely correct .. speaking of my own experience it's not just
keeping the data without the .prj files ..
I've also seen a lot of companys (including governments) sending shape
files just as the .shp
And i always wonder how ArcGIS is the job of correctly open the files ..
but thats
On 11/01/2011 10:19, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il giorno mar, 11/01/2011 alle 00.43 +0100, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
Ideally if all the data from government is in the same CRS, no
reprojecting will happen - because the project CRS will be the same as
the CRS of individual layers (thus no warning
Il giorno mar, 11/01/2011 alle 11.05 +0200, Micha Silver ha scritto:
So if they work without reprojection, everything works smoothly, and
they do not see anything wrong with that.
Not entirely correct. As QGIS works now, each new project
starts in Lon/Lat WGS84. If I all my layers are in
Not entirely correct. As QGIS works now, each new project
starts in Lon/Lat WGS84. If I all my layers are in the same
projected CRS I don't notice any problem *until* I want to
measure something ;-(
True, your suggestion to add the possibility to set a default CRS for the map
would be
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
Il giorno mar, 11/01/2011 alle 11.05 +0200, Micha Silver ha scritto:
So if they work without reprojection, everything works smoothly, and
they do not see anything wrong with that.
Not entirely correct. As QGIS
On 11/01/2011 11:31, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
Not entirely correct. As QGIS works now, each new project
starts in Lon/Lat WGS84. If I all my layers are in the same
projected CRS I don't notice any problem *until* I want to
measure something ;-(
True, your suggestion to add the possibility to
+1 for Martins idea!
I like it .. educating the user that way is a very good idea .. hope
it's not too hard to implement..
Werner
Am 11.01.2011 10:38, schrieb Martin Dobias:
My idea was that if they have layers with unknown CRS, also the
project's CRS would be set to unknown. So no
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Micha Silver mi...@arava.co.il wrote:
I agree with you that CRS handling should be improved. Having
'unknown' CRS is more useful than assigning a bogus CRS and then
trying to project it to some other CRS. I think we should remove
on-the-fly projections option
Il giorno ven, 07/01/2011 alle 21.20 +0100, Marco Hugentobler ha
scritto:
A very important use case here is people working with governemental data
provided by the local GIS department. The GIS dep. provides everything in the
same meter CRS and the normal user does not need to know about it,
Hi Nick
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Nick Hopton nhop...@gmail.com wrote:
When a layer is loaded and QGIS can't determine its CRS it would be
preferred if the CRS of that layer was shown as 'unknown', rather than
shown as being the default CRS. I know that this causes problems for
some
On 01/06/2011 08:14 PM, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi Nick
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Nick Hoptonnhop...@gmail.com wrote:
When a layer is loaded and QGIS can't determine its CRS it would be
preferred if the CRS of that layer was shown as 'unknown', rather than
shown as being the default CRS.
When a layer is loaded and QGIS can't determine its CRS it would be
preferred if the CRS of that layer was shown as 'unknown', rather than
shown as being the default CRS. I know that this causes problems for
some newcomers to QGIS.
I gather that this question was raised during the Hackfest in
14 matches
Mail list logo