Hi Luca,
there is an issue report open for this [1]
Kind regards,
Matthias
[1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10862
On Mon 21 Jul 2014 11:07:59 PM CEST, Luca Lanteri wrote:
Hi to all,
moving to qgis 2.4 I noticed a strange behaviour: if I define a python
init function for a form in Layer
Hi all,
I've just noticed something quite strange with the composer.
When changing focus from whatever application to a composer in QGIS,
pressing the delete keys still occurs in the previous application.
It is quite a problem, when the last app was the file browser since it
just delete a file
Thanks Matthias,
I search in the bug tracker some days ago and I didn't find this bug.
I'm too slow to send my issues, or others Qgis users are too fast !
;-)
regards
2014-07-22 8:20 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch:
Hi Luca,
there is an issue report open for this [1]
Kind
On 22/07/2014 4:45 pm, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've just noticed something quite strange with the composer.
When changing focus from whatever application to a composer in QGIS,
pressing the delete keys still occurs in the previous application.
It is quite a
Hi
I get an compile error on master:
[ 98%] Building CXX object
python/CMakeFiles/python_module_qgis__analysis.dir/analysis/sip_analysispart3.cpp.o
Linking CXX shared library ../output/python/qgis/_analysis.so
[ 98%] Built target python_module_qgis__analysis
[ 98%] Built target pyanalysis
[
Hi,
I would prefere another solution instead of changing the releases. The
documentation team is in the same situation. We are always behind the
releases, but the problem I see is that there are not enough people working
on the documents. At the moment we were not even able to start updating the
Hello all,
Same happened to me some minutes ago. A second run of make just make it
compile (I dindn't do nothing, don't ask :) ). I'm on Kubuntu 14.04.
Anyway, I get an error (posted yesterday) when running the compiled source:
Couldn't load PyQGIS.
Python support will be disabled.
Are you on the latest code? This build error was fixed last night.
On Jul 22, 2014 7:27 PM, Jorge Tornero - Listas jtorlis...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Same happened to me some minutes ago. A second run of make just make it
compile (I dindn't do nothing, don't ask :) ). I'm on Kubuntu
+1 with Otto, many many trainers do still almost all material from scratch,
we loose a lot of good contributors, and we loose money also (as a funder).
We started courses last year and pushed the will to have teachers contribute
to bugtracking and contribute to open source version of the docs.
Hi Otto,
You make some excellent points. Just to follow on one of them:
But usually customers and developers don't think about also spending
an additional
little amount to document the feature in the QGIS docs and training
material.
I think that's a QGIS problem. I know when I get quotes for
Hello, Nathan and Stefan and all,
Me too.
Jorge
El 22/07/14 11:30, Ziegler Stefan escribió:
Yes, checkout this morning.
Stefan
*Von:*Nathan Woodrow [mailto:madman...@gmail.com]
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014 11:28
*An:* Jorge Tornero - Listas
*Cc:* qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org;
+1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training materials
should coordinate and help the core QGIS documentation (both the manual and
the training manual) improve.
The solution is very simple: Require up to date, accurate documentation
for all commits of new features. This is
+ 1 to Otto and Victor.
Developers should develop, the can document some aspects of
code/feature (and they
already do this!) but we can not ask them to write manuals
2014-07-22 13:01 GMT+03:00 Victor Olaya vola...@gmail.com:
+1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training
Hi Lene,
On Mon, 21. Jul 2014 at 15:35:55 +, Lene Fischer wrote:
What if we had :
· A long term stable version for ex. 12 months with bugfix only
· A developer version for 4 months with new features and bugfixes = Stable
version with short bugfix-period = New developer??..
Not much
Except that self-evidently the current solution doesn't work well. Of the
three projects I listed, QGIS has by far the worst documentation; as Otto
noted, they've not even started updating for 2.4 yet.
Just looking now, not a single one of the QGIS Geoalgorithms that I've
ever looked at (which
Just looking now, not a single one of the QGIS Geoalgorithms that I've
ever looked at (which are I think is what Victor is referencing) have
anything in the help tab. And these are a core part of the software.
Yes that's what I mean. But, IMHO, it's better to have that functionality
there
Hi all.
Il 22/07/2014 12:32, Jonathan Moules ha scritto:
But is it working? I believe the point of an LTS is that each version is more
stable
than the last and that there are no new features which in turn means no new
bugs
The question is simple: maintaining a stable branch costs
Hi Paolo,
But is it working? I believe the point of an LTS is that each version is
more stable
than the last and that there are no new features which in turn means no
new bugs
The question is simple: maintaining a stable branch costs (developr
time|money).
If someone will put the
Il 22/07/2014 12:41, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
...
I am not saying that this is ideal, and that developers should not write
docs. I am
saying that time is limited and, if we put those restrictions, we might end up
rejecting a lot of interesting functionality.
Sorry for jumping in late. These
hello everybody
I really am stuck and I need help
my goal is to open the source code of qgis with qtcreator 5.x to change the
source code
I follow the steps:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qgis/QGIS/master/INSTALL
and all it works very well
purpose I Can not open the source code in
Il 22/07/2014 13:21, Jonathan Moules ha scritto:
Fair point, but then I'd ask - what would the cost be? Is it not something
that can
be covered by the current sponsorship given that a significant (or maybe just
significantly vocal ;-) ) portion of the community seems to be interested in
same problem here.
qscimod4.sip is not available on my machine and I don't know which
ubuntu package would contain this file.
Andreas
Am 22.07.2014 09:02, schrieb Ziegler Stefan:
Hi
I get an compile error on master:
[ 98%] Building CXX object
I am able to compile without that error if I make again after the first
make. Don't know if it helps but, providing it's a strange behaviour of
building tools for me, I guess I should tell it.
Jorge
El 22/07/14 13:53, Andreas Neumann escribió:
same problem here.
qscimod4.sip is not
Hi Jorge
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-October/028772.html
this seems to be a sip specific behaviour.
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-
boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von Jorge
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 22. Jul 2014 at 11:53:14 +, Andreas Neumann wrote:
same problem here.
qscimod4.sip is not available on my machine and I don't know which
ubuntu package would contain this file.
That's a debian bug (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755491)
The sip
When using a point shapefile I can get the point of geometry of a selected
feature. When using a point layer from a Spatialite DB I can not?
Shapefile:
lyr = QgsMapLayerRegistry.instance().mapLayersByName('point_shape')[0]
selection = lyr.selectedFeatures()
selection[0].geometry().asPoint()
Sorry, did the test in QGIS 2.2. The issue is not shapefile vs. spatialite,
but QGIS 2.2 API vs. 2.4.
There must be a change in API in QGIS 2.4 returning (0,0) using
selection[0].geometry().asPoint() on an arbitrary data source.
-
Jakob Lanstorp
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
where can I lookup, what packages are included in QGIS Windows
standalone/OSGeo4W builds? I am looking for PyQt4.QtSql and libqt4-sql-odbc.
Are they already included?
Regards
Otto
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Hi Otto,
AFAIK, PyQtSQL is a part of PyQt package, so it should be included
in OSGeo4W/standalone
2014-07-22 16:25 GMT+03:00 Otto Dassau das...@gbd-consult.de:
Hi,
where can I lookup, what packages are included in QGIS Windows
standalone/OSGeo4W builds? I am looking for PyQt4.QtSql and
Somehow my table was a multipoint table, converting it to a point table fixed
the problem. Sorry for the noice.
-
Jakob Lanstorp
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Spatialite-selection-0-geometry-asPoint-0-0-tp5152456p5152486.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Otto Dassau das...@gbd-consult.de wrote:
a) Trainers could combine their forces and prepair general training
materials
together that everybody can use and extend. All tools and the document
basis
is available and provided by QGIS project in the
Hey Jurgen,
We can disable the sip parts for the code editors for now if it is causing
issues. They are really only light wrappers around some QScintilla code.
- Nathan
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 22. Jul 2014 at 11:53:14 +,
Il 22/07/2014 16:57, Jorge Arevalo ha scritto:
I'm a developer of GDAL PostGIS Raster driver, and I'd like to know if it
would be
possible to modify the Add PostGIS Layer menu option to allow adding
PostGIS Raster
data, in addition to the PostGIS data.
This would be a much welcome
+1 for Bo Victor's idea which seems a good compromise to avoid that painful
LTS version.
What about having no fixed duration for the bug fixing phase for that
LTS-ish version, but releasing it only when there's no blocker left in
the tracker ? (I'd find it strange to publish such a version with
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Arevalo jorgearev...@libregis.org
wrote:
I'm a developer of GDAL PostGIS Raster driver, and I'd like to know if it
would be possible to modify the Add PostGIS Layer menu option to allow
adding PostGIS Raster data, in addition to the PostGIS
Il 22/07/2014 17:17, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto:
My suggestion is that*one* of the three version cycles is replaced with the
following:
Sorry Bo if I appear rude, but good ideas are not what we are missing.
Manpower (~=money) is what is missing to implement them.
Therefore: funding welcome,
Hi Otto,
On Tue, 22. Jul 2014 at 15:25:58 +0200, Otto Dassau wrote:
where can I lookup, what packages are included in QGIS Windows
standalone/OSGeo4W builds?
You can check the http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/x86(_64)/setup.ini.
The standalone install includes qgis-full and all it
Paolo -
Your answer is not rude, but it's not quite correct. My master plan
would simply shift 2 months every year from development of new features
to bug-fixing. This alone won't cost any extra resources. It would
simply give a large time window for bug-fixing/testing/documenting on a
Hi Bo,
On Tue, 22. Jul 2014 at 17:17:43 +0200, Bo Victor Thomsen wrote:
Furthermore: Every new release contains - of course - new features and
bug fixes. But with the addition of new features you always get some new
bugs; both in the new features but occasionally in some _existing,
On Wed, 23. Jul 2014 at 00:18:58 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
I'll check what else I can do, once I now which other distributions are
affected.
We can disable the sip parts for the code editors for now if it is causing
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 06:59:35PM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
On Tue, 22. Jul 2014 at 17:17:43 +0200, Bo Victor Thomsen wrote:
Furthermore: Every new release contains - of course - new features and
bug fixes. But with the addition of new features you always get some new
bugs; both
It a chicken/egg problem. We need to have some stable, relatively bug free
version of QGIS with predictable (and somewhat slow ) release cycles before
it's acceptable in large organisations (with money to spend on
development/bug fixing).
I think this is true, though I dont have experience
Is it a common practice for developer to fill feature requests for
Documentation and help whenever they create new features? This would still
free developers to keep creating good stuff, and help others to keep track
of what needs attention in Docs. Using the visual changelog and scrolling
Just to stretch my point -
* I'm not argumenting for a regular LTS version in parallel with a
development version including back-porting and patching to several
versions of QGIS. I have developed software for 30 years; I know the
efforts and pains of parallel versions :-/
* I'm trying
1. Hit the *Configure* button near the bottom of the window.
2. Pick 'XCode' as the generator and choose to use the native compilers.
3. Answer *Ok* when asked if you want to create the build directory.
4. Wait for the configure process to finish
5. The screen will now have several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 22/07/2014 22:50, Bo Victor Thomsen wrote:
Just to stretch my point -
* I'm not argumenting for a regular LTS version in parallel with
a development version including back-porting and patching to
several versions of QGIS. I have developed
46 matches
Mail list logo
