Hi all,
Is there any need to keep this plugin. It's really old and there is a
growing number of other ways to do this process.
Having 10 different ways to do 1 thing is not good so I would like to
remove it from the code if we can and focus efforts in other areas to
improve those.
Objections?
None here.
Thanks.
Il 4 dicembre 2015 06:07:06 CET, Nathan Woodrow ha
scritto:
>Hi all,
>
>Is there any need to keep this plugin. It's really old and there is a
>growing number of other ways to do this process.
>
>Having 10 different ways to do 1 thing is not good so I
Seems nobody is reading the CODING document ;)
http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/qgisdevelopersguide.html#dialogs
On 12/03/2015 02:38 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Doing some out of the box experience UI clean up e.g what is the first
> thing you get when you run from
Hi Stefano
as stated in a message in italian qgis community, the problem is that
you hare three qgis version using the same .qgis2/ where conf and user
plugin are installed
so you have a unique Processing but different version available
compatible with the three qgis version
you should start
Apologies if this is too off-topic, but with Travis releasing their new
Google Compute Engine infrastructure, I've done some work on my Travis
setup, including moving from Ubuntu Precise to Trusty. Briefly, the issues I
encountered under Trusty as opposed to Precise were:
- xvfb now has to be
I should also have mentioned that Travis are also migrating "Precise with
sudo" jobs over to Google Compute Engine (GCE) this week. This should lower
test times, but watch out for any resulting differences in behaviour. If you
want to stick with Precise, but force your tests onto GCE immediately,
Hi, I have posted this on User list, but maybe is better to ask here...
i have some installation of qgis on my windows 8.
I installed via osgeo4w:
2.8.4-2 (LTR dev)
2.12.1-1 (Lyon)
2.13.0-21 (dev)
but there is a problem with the update processing.
In fact, if I upgrade it to 2.12.2 from 2.10.99,
Hi, I noticed that QgsExpression class can't evaluate layers that are not
loaded in QgsMapLayerRegistry.
This is a bit annoying because expressions could be evaluated against a
temporary datasource or external data without necessary show it to the
user. (an alternative question could be: Is it
Hi Nathan,
you can have a look to a the new version of changeDataSource plugin I was
releasing: https://github.com/enricofer/changeDataSource
Once installed, clicking on toolbutton [image: Immagine incorporata 3] is
possible to change the datasources of loaded layers
Expressions are used to
Hi,
Can you paste and example?
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:10 pm Enrico Ferreguti wrote:
> Hi, I noticed that QgsExpression class can't evaluate layers that are not
> loaded in QgsMapLayerRegistry.
> This is a bit annoying because expressions could be evaluated against a
>
On 3 December 2015 at 12:38, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Doing some out of the box experience UI clean up e.g what is the first thing
> you get when you run from clean config.
>
> Anyone stressed if I kill this button?
Not me. I can only find 1 or 2 controls
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry for the encripted message,
I do use this at least in plugins, and I think others do similar things.
https://github.com/gem/oq-irmt-qgis/blob/master/svir/ui/tool_button_with
_help_link.py
On 03.12.2015 09:15, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Seems
FYI,
There was some more discussion on the UX list:
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-ux/2015-December/thread.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
I guess the question is. Do we really care if it goes?
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 6:23 pm Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Sorry for the encripted message,
>
> I do use this at least in plugins, and I think others do similar things.
>
>
On 3 December 2015 at 19:19, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> On 3 December 2015 at 12:38, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Doing some out of the box experience UI clean up e.g what is the first thing
>> you get when you run from clean config.
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Charset: utf-8
Version: GnuPG v2
hQEMA7VjPIs7RfXoAQf9EYhx7q6JHl3tDkdm7LRHnL2OHIQkmtlf5xMkm7P/Pi/K
UaFJGJQt7wtK1MQU2QgVYb3SKMCWQNsGrQ4Zqo5T44me5iUMi+r0/uu2xV2DzmGV
mTJE8yHGLvP118SxEaiRzdjwCJvSZZJO7XxPrrF5IH5D0C7HqMO/NrW6/6NAOcn0
Hi all,
The PR has been merged by Matthias Kuhn. You could now test it directly in
last master.
Regards,
Michaël
2015-12-01 16:17 GMT+01:00 kimaidou :
> oups, gmail got rid of the table... Here is a human readable version
>
> Method used --> vertex number
>
> "geom" --> 3
Hi,
I'm thinking of writing my own processing provider.
Is the interface for processing providers considered stable - i.e. future
releases of QGIS are unlikely to break existing providers?
Many thanks
Crispin
--
Dr Crispin Cooper
Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University
33
Hi Tom,
Testing here:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2532
Recently build times are horrible and we get a lot of false alarms due
to build timeouts. If this makes it any better we should switch.
Looking forward to trusty but had no success so far unfortunately.
Sorry,
after a long time,
I destructed and recreated the plugin.
It is currently awaiting check, it has not changed since the last time,
expect the folder name is now the same as the plugin name.
Cheers,
RémiC
2015-05-30 16:58 GMT+02:00 Rémi Cura :
> Thanks to both !
>
Not here, never seen a user use such tools in any software..
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Out-of-the-box-QGIS-experience-and-What-s-this-Tool-button-tp5239742p5239846.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Apologies - my instructions for forcing GCE were correct only for
Precise-only Travis configs. The QGIS config is both Linux and OSX. See this
page for instructions to force GCE for multiple os: configs:
https://gist.github.com/meatballhat/d0c8aab9e3bd8a8bcacd#file-00-intro-md
I'm not familiar
On 12/03/2015 03:57 PM, Tom Chadwin wrote:
>> we could use a different platform for Qt5 tests
> ...and Python 3?
... is enabled automatically when compiling against Qt5 but none of the
python tests will currently pass because there's a lot of work missing.
But enabling Qt5 builds even without
OK. And the OSX build was unaffected by the top-level selection of Precise?
Seems not, but I have no experience of reading OSX test output.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Moving-to-Trusty-for-Travis-tests-tp5239822p5239879.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS -
Hi Matthias,
as mentioned in your announcement as of Nov 10 (same subject) I was trying
to build the newest git pull.
After a long compilation it finally ended in
...
import PyQt4.uic.pyuic
ImportError: No module named PyQt4.uic.pyuic
...
Other than that, I installed all requirement
for Ubuntu
Hi Karl,
Are you aware that python 3 support by no means is production ready. Not
even a single core plugin is compatible. It's just the C++ interface
that is ready to be compiled on a python 3 system. So if you need
something python related at all in QGIS you will not want to work with
this at
Hi Tom,
I merged the pull request linked in the last mail since there were no
errors and no timeout.
I hope that this solves our issues.
The matrix notation should only be required if there are different
requirements for different platforms.
However, what I just DID realize while reading your
> we could use a different platform for Qt5 tests
...and Python 3?
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Moving-to-Trusty-for-Travis-tests-tp5239822p5239867.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
first of all, what does this expression really mean ? Sorry, I'm not a
native english speaker so not always easy to find the right explanation of
some words.
2015-12-03 20:14 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Hi all,
> I wonder what is the criterion to mark a plugin as
Il 03/12/2015 20:31, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
> The original idea was to mark the most important plugins as "featured",
> kind of staff's pick or "recommended".
>
> Any admin (including you) can set/clear the "featured" flag.
>
> There is no criterion, you can decide which plugins are
Hi all,
I wonder what is the criterion to mark a plugin as featured. There is
even one featured plugin which is now deprecated.
Perhaps we should have clear criteria for inclusion, and keep the list
updated?
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses:
2015-12-03 20:34 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 03/12/2015 20:31, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
>
> > The original idea was to mark the most important plugins as "featured",
> > kind of staff's pick or "recommended".
> >
> > Any admin (including you) can set/clear the
Am 03.12.2015, 20:14 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini :
Hi all,
I wonder what is the criterion to mark a plugin as featured. There is
even one featured plugin which is now deprecated.
Perhaps we should have clear criteria for inclusion, and keep the list
updated?
All the
2015-12-03 20:14 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Hi all,
> I wonder what is the criterion to mark a plugin as featured. There is
> even one featured plugin which is now deprecated.
> Perhaps we should have clear criteria for inclusion, and keep the list
> updated?
> All the
Am 03.12.2015, 23:10 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Neumann :
But why?
Most of the table manager functions are already in Core. It is perfectly
possible to add and remove columns without the table >manager.
If some of the table manager functions are still missing in core, it is
Table Manager helps renaming, reordering fields (not yet available) and
while removing/deleting/reordering fields, you can preview how your table
will look like.
I'm neither for enabling plugins by default but adding in Core such _basic_
features users look for will be an improvement
2015-12-03
Good cuestión
I should add also a standard way to download external executables or modules
On Thursday, 3 December 2015, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> I was actually also thinking about the "What's this" as a
> possible way to mention what clicking on a button would have
> done
Agree with you, Bernd, that features like the ones provided by "Table
Manager" plugin should be in QGIS by default. However, installing (and
enabling) by default other dev's plugins mean that QGIS dev team should
somehow be responsible of its stability; there are already Core plugins
(Processing,
But why?
Most of the table manager functions are already in Core. It is perfectly
possible to add and remove columns without the table manager.
If some of the table manager functions are still missing in core, it is
better to bring the missing functionality into core, rather than
enabling
On 4 December 2015 at 09:10, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> But why?
>
> Most of the table manager functions are already in Core. It is perfectly
> possible to add and remove columns without the table manager.
>
> If some of the table manager functions are still missing in core, it
I was just going to go through my plugins and add the "What' this?" text.
I guess I'll find something better to do. Glad I check here regularly!
*Worth Lutz*
On 12/3/2015 3:22 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On 3 December 2015 at 19:19, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On 3 December
I was actually also thinking about the "What's this" as a
possible way to mention what clicking on a button would have
done (might become complex).
What's the recommended way to embed documentation ?
--strk;
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:10:24PM -0500, Worth Lutz wrote:
> I was just going to go
As a recent new user, (and now a custom plugin writer), I did not
remember that there was a plugin page. I look for plugins in the plugin
manager as that is what come to mind first before I start googling.
I also lurk here for valuable info. :)
*Worth Lutz*
On 12/3/2015 2:59 PM, Bernd
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Vaclav Petras
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Eugenio Trumpy
> wrote:
>
>> We hope r.mapcalc will be added in the toolbox, soon.
>
>
>
> As far as I know, nobody is working on that now. But it is
44 matches
Mail list logo