Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hi Marco, there is an OGR geoalgorithm that seems to do what you are describing in QGIS Processing (Dissolve polygons) maybe its easy to adapt it to also work with lines ... Il 22/02/2017 10:32, Marco Grisolia ha scritto: Hi, I recently answered to a question on GIS StackExchange [0]. In this

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Hi all, Where can I found this daily osgeo4w installer ? Is it here : http://qgis.org/downloads/weekly/?C=M;O=D Last build seems dated from : 14-Nov-2016 Is there a place where we can get more recent build for windows ? Regards Arnaud Morvan Ingénieur logiciel Tél: +33 (0)4 58 48 20 32

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Yes, apparently the dissolve tool merges adjacent geometries into a single "part" when operating on polygons, but not when operating on lines. 2017-02-22 11:46 GMT+01:00 Marco Grisolia : > Hmm maybe I'm wrong, but I think it will only return singleparts without > taking

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hi Marco, The Dissolve tool already has a "unique fields" option. It sounds like you are reinventing that. Best wishes, Anita On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Marco Grisolia wrote: > Hi, > I recently answered to a question on GIS StackExchange [0]. In this >

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Hi, Arnaud, you might find it at http://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html Harrissou 2017-02-22 11:15 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Morvan : > Hi all, > > Where can I found this daily osgeo4w installer ? > > Is it here : http://qgis.org/downloads/weekly/?C=M;O=D > > Last

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

You can run multiplart to singlepart afterwards. On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:18 AM, roy roy wrote: > Hi Anita, that does not do what Marco is asking for, because you get a > multipart geometry; > > he needs a linestring geometry I think... > > Il 22/02/2017 11:10, Anita

[Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hi, I recently answered to a question on GIS StackExchange [0]. In this question, the asker was looking for a way for dissolving features using an adjacency criterion instead of using common attribute field (please, follow the link below for a better understanding). This feature is already

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hi Anita, that does not do what Marco is asking for, because you get a multipart geometry; he needs a linestring geometry I think... Il 22/02/2017 11:10, Anita Graser ha scritto: Hi Marco, The Dissolve tool already has a "unique fields" option. It sounds like you are reinventing that. Best

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hello, the example on StackExchange seems to do this for the currently selected features. It might also be desirable to do this for an entire layer, e.g. join at all places where exactly two line features are adjacent. (I think v.build.polylines does this, but apparently it is not available from

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Thanks to all for the answers! I really appreciate. @Daan, actually it should work for all the features for a specific field (I set it inside the code, but it may easily become an input parameter). So, after the setting of a specific field, the code will dissolve all the features which have the

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

Hmm maybe I'm wrong, but I think it will only return singleparts without taking care of an adjacency criterion (even if ran after the dissolving operation). Marco 2017-02-22 11:37 GMT+01:00 Anita Graser : > You can run multiplart to singlepart afterwards. > > > On Wed, Feb

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 13:39:11 +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 11:15:46 +0100, Arnaud Morvan wrote: > > Where can I found this daily osgeo4w installer ? > osgeo4w.osgeo.org. For the dailies/nightlies. It has: qgis-ltr (2.14 release) qgis-ltr-dev

Re: [Qgis-developer] 3.0 Documentation and branching

I can try. Although I don't have your eye for details. :-) A qua, 22/02/2017, 12:01, DelazJ escreveu: > Hi, > > 2017-02-22 0:38 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Neto : > > According to the latest news, it seems that there will make sense to have > a 2.18

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Luca I have 2.14, 2.18 and master from osgeo4w. No issues at all ;) giovanni Il 22 feb 2017 13:54, "Luca Mandolesi" ha scritto: > Is there a possibility to have a QGIS3 "Master" Standalone installer to > download it and begin to porting my own plugins from Python27 to

Re: [Qgis-developer] 3.0 Documentation and branching

Hi, 2017-02-22 0:38 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Neto : > According to the latest news, it seems that there will make sense to have > a 2.18 Documentation release... > > Sorry for trying to "rush" it to 3.0. Or will it be 3.2? > > Anyway, I am going to put some effort in fixing 2.x

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Tim Sutton said: > Personally I was hoping for 2.18 LTR to last from June 2017 to June 2018 > and then releasing 3.2 In June 2018. > > * retire 2.14 in June 2017 > * 2.18 becomes LTR from June 2017 to ​**​*June*** ​2018 > * 3.0 feature freeze in July 2017 > * release 3.0 in Sept 2017 > * release

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Thanks Jürgen, for maintaining this Arnaud Le 22/02/2017 à 13:58, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit : Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 13:39:11 +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 11:15:46 +0100, Arnaud Morvan wrote: Where can I found this daily osgeo4w installer ?

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Is there a possibility to have a QGIS3 "Master" Standalone installer to download it and begin to porting my own plugins from Python27 to Python3? My Osgeo4W is my work enviroment and I'm afraid to destroy anything. I'm so scared of P3!!! Best regards. Luca

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Hi Luca, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 13:54:07 +0100, Luca Mandolesi wrote: > Is there a possibility to have a QGIS3 "Master" Standalone installer to > download it and begin to porting my own plugins from Python27 to Python3? > > My Osgeo4W is my work enviroment and I'm afraid to destroy anything.

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS 3 master available in OSGeo4W! Youhou....

Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 11:15:46 +0100, Arnaud Morvan wrote: > Where can I found this daily osgeo4w installer ? osgeo4w.osgeo.org. I thought there would be NSIS installers too at the url you pointed at. Probably a space issue. I'll investigate. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Personally I would like to see a 3.x release become LTR as soon as possible. 3.0 should be skipped because despite it's incredibly high stability there could potentially still be problems. So the next in line is 3.2. I think having 2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended period is

Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature proposal for the Dissolve tool

On 22 February 2017 at 21:06, Daan Goedkoop wrote: > Yes, apparently the dissolve tool merges adjacent geometries into a > single "part" when operating on polygons, but not when operating on > lines. > Perhaps you're looking for the "merge lines" tool? That will join the parts

Re: [Qgis-developer] Outline/border -> stroke?

On 7 February 2017 at 18:52, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on one of the points raised by John Hawkison (author of > the famous "my first weekend with QGIS" email), I'd like to raise > discussion about renaming all use of outline/border throughout QGIS to

Re: [Qgis-developer] Map Settings variables are not updating

Sure A qua, 22/02/2017, 20:14, Nyall Dawson escreveu: > On 21 February 2017 at 21:04, Alexandre Neto > wrote: > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but seems that the Map Settings > variables > > of map items in the print composer are not being

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Matthias Kuhn wrote: > I think having 2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended > period is a good thing (...) but with a clear deadline for 2.18 so we are > not stuck in the 2 release series forever. and Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > When a new LTR is released we have a period where

Re: [Qgis-developer] Resize QGIS line or polygon about its centroid

Hi Regis, I would assume that in this use case the user would not be modifying the source polygons, but would make a copy of them which could be a memory layer and then resize them. I mentioned resizing small features so that they visibly would be better shown on the map, but the other use case

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

It's an option, too. The question is which one is supposed to be more mature, stable and polished: 3.2.5 or 3.4.0. Anyway, in both cases the lifetime of 2.18 LTR seems to be clear now. Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2017 15:22:11 DelazJ pisze: > Hi, > > I think there usually (ok! it happens only once)

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2017 14:45:07 Borys Jurgiel pisze: > Other options would be: retire 2.18 LTR in January 2018 or postpone 3.2 > until June 2018. Both look unacceptable for me. I mean to* me of course - they look to me, not 'unacceptable for me'. I'm sorry :) Regards, Borys

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Hi, I think there usually (ok! it happens only once) is an overlap between two LT releases: 2.8 was maintained few months after 2.14 (I think it was stopped when 2.16 was released) - http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html So following that logic, 3.2 would be released in

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [1181] Hotspot Analysis approval notification.

Plugin Hotspot Analysis approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1181] Hotspot Analysis 0.1 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/HotspotAnalysis/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [Qgis-developer] Missing the support for scale parameter in WMS Legend

On 23 February 2017 at 17:06, Andrea Peri wrote: > Hi, > we at Tuscany Region in 2013 fundedthe adding of the support of scale > legend in the wms provider. > That (if I remenber was added to the 2.2 or 2.4 version of qgis). > > These are the commit for that adding: > >

[Qgis-developer] Missing the support for scale parameter in WMS Legend

Hi, we at Tuscany Region in 2013 fundedthe adding of the support of scale legend in the wms provider. That (if I remenber was added to the 2.2 or 2.4 version of qgis). These are the commit for that adding: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/8fb20f038d9d6c67bafc932ccea1d688ef2d5363

Re: [Qgis-developer] Missing the support for scale parameter in WMS Legend

Do you have the commit where it was removed? That would normally have the message on why. Nathan On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 5:06 pm Andrea Peri wrote: > Hi, > we at Tuscany Region in 2013 fundedthe adding of the support of scale > legend in the wms provider. > That (if I

Re: [Qgis-developer] Missing the support for scale parameter in WMS Legend

Unfortunatelly no. :( A. 2017-02-23 8:10 GMT+01:00 Nathan Woodrow : > Do you have the commit where it was removed? That would normally have the > message on why. > > Nathan > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 5:06 pm Andrea Peri wrote: >> >> Hi, >> we at

Re: [Qgis-developer] Missing the support for scale parameter in WMS Legend

Hi Nathan I find only this commit. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/836e1a86368f9eace236d24ba40b7af77a6bc63d But it speak of don't refresh legend symbology everytime the extent changes I'm not so skill on qgis code to understand what it do. Our feture was for a retrieving of the new legend

Re: [Qgis-developer] Field Menu Range settings odd behaviour

Hi, working with Field menu range in QGIS 2.18 I notice that the problem is still there despite the introduction of costraint: say that i want to set a range for an integer field called "numfield" with min value 1 max value 5 step 1 at this point i would expect that QGIS only accepts "1 2 3

Re: [Qgis-developer] Resize QGIS line or polygon about its centroid

Oh, I didn't get that you want to actually change the geometry itself not its style. I usually don't play with geometry for representation purpose, or sometimes I store alternate geometries but I keep the original one. Are you aware of the geometry generator renderer ? You could apply a

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

Hi Harrissou, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 15:22:11 +0100, DelazJ wrote: > I think there usually (ok! it happens only once) is an overlap between two > LT releases: 2.8 was maintained few months after 2.14 (I think it was > stopped when 2.16 was released). Yes. We build for two package repositories.

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [1046] QGIS GML Application Schema Toolbox approval notification.

Plugin QGIS GML Application Schema Toolbox approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1046] QGIS GML Application Schema Toolbox 1.0.2" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/gml_application_schema_toolbox/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list

[Qgis-developer] Effects interfering with concentration map?

Hi all, in QGIS 2.18.3, apparently concentration maps are not displayed if rendering effects are enabled: does someone please confirm? All the best, and thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html

Re: [Qgis-developer] Map Settings variables are not updating

On 21 February 2017 at 21:04, Alexandre Neto wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but seems that the Map Settings variables > of map items in the print composer are not being updated when the map item > changes. > > It seems to be just a display problem. using one of