probabilly that's the problem, at this moment I've no one to share
with, so I ask :)...
who want to share with me and has already booked?
let me know...
ciao Luigi Pirelli (aka @ginetto)
On 11 August 2013 07:48, Saber Razmjooei
saber.razmjo...@lutraconsulting.co.uk wrote:
Hi Gino,
If you
Hi all,
what is the final decision on this?
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Hey all,
In order to close another blocking issue off the list I would like to
propose that we run with the vector version of the current logo that has
been created in
Hey Alex,
We are going with the svg that is assigned to that ticket for this release.
- Nathan
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Alexander Bruy
alexander.b...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
what is the final decision on this?
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
So is the proposal to change Analysis to Processing?
I don't think there's a reason to remove the SEXTANTE branding as
SEXTANTE does exist outside a QGIS context, ftools is another story
since that only exists in QGIS. I'm split on GDAL Tools, since it is
good to make sure users know what
I wasn't very fond of this idea because or course I like the SEXTANTE
branding itself, but in terms of integration I now think it is better.
For a user that wants to do some analysis, keeping the SEXTANTE name
means that the user has to know that SEXTANTE is an analysis platform,
instead of just
Hi
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.comwrote:
Hi Victor,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Victor Olaya vola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
After much thinking and considering some suggestions, I think it would
be a good idea to remove the SEXTANTE branding, and
Hi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote:
So is the proposal to change Analysis to Processing?
I don't think there's a reason to remove the SEXTANTE branding as
SEXTANTE does exist outside a QGIS context, ftools is another story
since that only exists
Showing SEXTANTE, GDAL Tools, fTools in the menu is the implementation
model leaking into the UI. The users don't care how it's implemented as
long as it works.
- Nathan
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Alex Mandel
Hi All
If we want to be ready with QGIS 2.0 for FOSS4G2013 we should ideally be
ready to branch for release at the beginning of September (since most of us
will be migrating to the land of deep fried mars bars for September).
Here is my proposal to achieve that:
* 12 Aug GUI Freeze, String
Well there's an interesting dilemma, I mostly agree that core plugins
don't need to be listed in the plugin manager.. except when one wants to
disable them to get faster load times of QGIS, or to hide those features.
Maybe they should be renamed to Core Vector Tools, Core Raster Tools,
Core
Small reminder: neither the QGIS application shortcut (on linux and windows
OSes) nor the logo used in the About QGIS window are using the above
mentioned SVG.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Alex,
We are going with the svg that is assigned to
11 matches
Mail list logo
