Re: [Qgis-developer] W*S obtain only the server url
+1 On 7 December 2013 17:35, G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com wrote: What about using urlparse: http://docs.python.org/2/library/urlparse.html? 2013/12/7 Gino Pirelli lui...@gmail.com Hi Luca usign QT you can: create QUrl and then query url with it's method queryItemValue probably there's a pure python method... that it's always better reducing QT coupling. If you find a pure python way... please post it. ciao Ginetto On 6 December 2013 10:47, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, I have a WFS layer and I would like to obtain the server url using pyqgis. Now I'm using layer.source(), but it return the entire url with all the parameters. Is there a way to abtain only the server url? When QGIS create the string for the request it append every time REQUEST parameter for first? Could I split the string using it? Thanks -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-psc] PR1007 bump minimum to 4.7: objections?
Hi Sent from my mobile On 01 Dec 2013 8:57 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote: On 11/30/2013 06:29 AM, Tim Sutton wrote: Hi On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.netwrote: On 30-11-13 01:44, Nyall Dawson wrote: Ok - so what's the final call here? Is someone willing to make a final decision between bumping to 4.6 and keeping support for lucid or bumping to 4.7 and dropping lucid? (Looks like 4.8 is out of the question at the moment). If someone can make a call I'll update the pull request and make sure all #ifdef's for versions 4.6/4.7 are removed. Hi Nyall, if I am correct, I think the general view of devs is that a bump to 4.7 only is not worth to pull without: 1) a cleanup of stuff that is not needed anymore because of the change 2) a (good) purpose on why to do it one of the devs told me: why not a good PR with 1) the bump 2) the cleanup 3) the new stuff I think this whole discussion is because of different ideas about this kind of pull requests between different people. @psc maybe we should write down this kind of things in governance? @nyall is a PR like above doable for you? Regards, Richard Duivenvoorde ___ Qgis-psc mailing list qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc For me upgrading to 4.7 is a +0 - I still use QGIS on 12.04 systems and I suspect that others do too. However 14.04 is just around the corner so it wont be hard to wait an extra few months before running QGIS 2.2. What about being more aggressive and actually porting to Qt5? Its been out for a while now and should represent a stable target for us to develop against. Regards Tim Tim, The controversy is over 10.04 (Qt 4.6) not 12.04 (Qt 4.8) To me it seems good enough to bump to 4.6 now without breaking anything and to consider 4.8 as minimum for QGIS 2.2 Ah sorry I have the wrong end of the stick to as usual :-) . Regards Tim That seems reasonable given what out there and providing packagers time to catch up. Presumably there are known fixes and features that devs intend to take advantage of for 2.2 that warrant this shift (previous notes on this thread indicate this to be true). Move to Qt5 seems like a whole different discussion depending on level or work needed. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [326] osmSearch approval notification.
Plugin osmSearch approval by timlinux. The plugin version [326] osmSearch 0.3.1 Experimental is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/osmSearch/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] osmSearch Plugin approval notification
Hi I approved it. Regards Tim On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:37 PM, p0cisk p0c...@o2.pl wrote: Hi all, I was uploaded osmSearch Plugin v 0.3.1 30 of June and it has not been reviewed since then! Can anyone approve it, it fix character encoding error. Regards Piotr Pociask -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/osmSearch-Plugin-approval-notification-tp5092745.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member == Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [373] GEarthView approval notification.
Plugin GEarthView approval by timlinux. The plugin version [373] GEarthView 1.0.4 is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/gearthview/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New GEarthView 1.0.4 version - plugin for QGis
Done thanks! Regards Tim On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Geo DrinX geodr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I just inserted a new version of GEarthView plugin for QGis. Please, approve it (if you like :) Regards Roberto ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member == Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [129] ELECTRE-TRI approval notification.
Plugin ELECTRE-TRI approval by timlinux. The plugin version [129] ELECTRE-TRI 0.3.1 is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgis_etri/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Plugin [129] ELECTRE-TRI approval notification.
Plugin ELECTRE-TRI approval by timlinux. The plugin version [129] ELECTRE-TRI 0.4.1 is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgis_etri/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] fixes for python-sip 4.15
Hi Hans-Peter
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net wrote:
Hi,
being a newbie in gis affairs and therefore in QGIS, I would like to say
warmth hello.
Not being a newbie for python nor python-{sip,qt*} affairs, I noticed some
issues of QGIS with sip 4.15 onwards. It was a rather noticeable update, as
many complex bindings broke. Thankfully, the fixes are easy enough: it
boils
down to declare some missing private methods in the respective sip files.
Please see attached patches. What do you think?
I noticed, that these issues are tackled differently in the current git:
they're moved to protected methods. This is rather suboptimal, since due to
sips protected is public trick, the whole protection is void.
BTW, I build my stuff in the public:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/home:frispete:geo
and attempt to feed my fixes upstream (with this message) as well as to the
more prominent openSUSE feeds (Application:Geo), but the submit request is
still pending.
While at it, I noticed a long stream of error messages related to srs.db
handling during build. A crude fix for that is also attached, but I have to
admit, that I didn't fully grok the details of the database handling in
this
regard. I first concentrated on getting a clean build. Hence, I included
the
sample data as an additional package.
Now, the hopefully soon to be available packages for openSUSE are in a much
better shape than before. Somebody with a deeper builder and user
experience
taking a look is highly appreciated, especially related to the available
extensions. Which one's are really open source, which is a prerequisite for
being build on the OBS?
Cheers,
Pete
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Thanks, I applied it to master as 074fd87.
Regards
Tim
--
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
