Il 28/06/2014 23:13, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
matplotlib is a dependency of a few algorithms in Processing, but it was
giving a lot of problems, so those algorithms are disabled since some
time ago. If matplotlib is not used by anything else, I guess it can be
Which algs exactly?
Thanks.
--
Il 27/06/2014 10:43, Vincent Picavet ha scritto:
We should definitly get more information on our user base, gather statistics
(anonymous, or through website stats), so that we can know what really
matters
to our users. We should not develop software for ourselves, but for people
who
Hi,
following users feedback (see [0]), we still seem to be not pushing enough
changelog / what's new:
* it is not available from dowload page
http://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html#
* from homepage (see [1]), the check out new features link in image still
points today to 2.0 doc.
On 30-06-14 11:04, Régis Haubourg wrote:
Hi,
following users feedback (see [0]), we still seem to be not pushing enough
changelog / what's new:
* it is not available from dowload page
http://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html#
* from homepage (see [1]), the check out new
Hi all,
I find I'm often adding layers to a map solely for labelling, and
having to set the symbology for these layers to a 100% transparent
symbol so that the features themselves aren't shown.
This seems rather hacky and inefficient, since QGIS is still rendering
these feature, they just aren't
On 30 June 2014 19:20, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.net wrote:
Tim asked people to write 'items' for the changelog. As that is what it
is: a little application in which people can write an 'item' and add
some screendumps.
On that note, Tim can you please add a 2.6 version to the
Hi,
I like the idea of the no symbols renderer. Probably the easiest of
the proposed solutions for the user.
Andreas
Am 30.06.2014 12:38, schrieb Nyall Dawson:
Hi all,
I find I'm often adding layers to a map solely for labelling, and
having to set the symbology for these layers to a 100%
+1 for a no symbol renderer. I also had a use case when styling OSM data.
I guess it should be either the first or the last option on the
renderer list. Probably the last.
Best wishes,
Anita
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alexandre Neto senhor.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I think No symbol renderer
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating a ELSE rule with a no-symbol layer to keep track of nb
of features not rendered.).
Math
On 30 Jun 2014 19:38, Nyall Dawson
Hi, I am trying to compile qgis 2.4.0 in Windows 7 for Visual Studio 10.
I have been trying to set up all the required dependencies with CMake 3.0.
And I have been able to link all the dependencies by using OSGeo4W, even
though there are lots of missing instructions on qgis website for Windows
I am not sure exactly if it's really a dependency problem. I pasted the
warnings here, it mentions MetaSearch, that's why I thought it is
related. But as it is complaining about a missing __init__.py in a
python site-packages directory it might as well be a distribution or
local configuration
Hey everyone,
*Weekly Report 6*
*What was done this week?*
- Worked on ways to implement the direction/angular constraint. Have to
try more than one approach to see which one is working best for the project.
*What is the plan for next week?*
- Will continue to try different
I've sumbitted a pull request [1] to add fine grained control to spatial
operators controlling select/extract by location algorithms, both in fTools
and Processing.
If you feel other options should be added let me know.
giovanni
[1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1495
--
Giovanni Allegri
Hi,
excellent idea if we get speed improvement !
I don't have QGIS running here right now, but I remember having seen a no
symbol checkbox in rule based renderer. If we look for consistant UI, we
should have the same checkbox for classical renderers on symbol level. I
remember being puzzled when
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating a ELSE rule with a no-symbol layer to keep track of nb
of features not rendered.).
You can already have no symbol for a rule.
Ahh, one learns everyday. When checked, are the labels still drawn?
On 1 Jul 2014 06:36, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating
16 matches
Mail list logo
