Hi Walter
When you connect to the PostGis database make sure that you have selected the
Use estimated metadata option - this optimises the connection for large
datasets - see attached screenshot. This should greatly improve the connection
times for postigs. (If you are already doing this
Hi,
I noticed that somebody started to add commercials to commit logs:
Sponsored by
Funded by ...
etc. etc.
We should take this seriously, mostly ever developer works for a
company or run its own business.
Imagine if everybody starts adding those (not really useful) sentences
to every
Hi Alessandro.
+1 .
Almost because I guess the Public Administration should be stop di
wast resources in gfoss.
:)
So the private could use their money as like better.
Instead the public should simply acquire licenses of commecial.
This could resolve any problem.
Dont ?
A.
2014-10-10 9:11
2014-10-10 9:30 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri aperi2...@gmail.com:
Hi Alessandro.
+1 .
Almost because I guess the Public Administration should be stop di
wast resources in gfoss.
:)
So the private could use their money as like better.
Instead the public should simply acquire licenses of
Hi Alessandro,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 09:11:46 +0200, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
I noticed that somebody started to add commercials to commit logs:
Sponsored by
Funded by ...
etc. etc.
We should take this seriously, mostly ever developer works for a
company or run its own
2014-10-10 9:30 GMT+02:00 G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com:
Hi Alessandro,
we surely can find a better way but I don't see any solution at the moment
when an institution wants to have an official track of what has been
developed with their funding.
What about release notes? Changelog ?
--
On 10 October 2014 18:11, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that somebody started to add commercials to commit logs:
Sponsored by
Funded by ...
etc. etc.
We should take this seriously, mostly ever developer works for a
company or run its own business.
The question is that whn we use an european fund to fund a develope
for gfoss (like qgis).
The enhancement is an advantace for all.
This is a certain.
But the European require to certificate the reality of the Fund
putting a disclaimer on the product realized.
Otherwise no fund at all.
I guess
I'm with Nyall. I see no direct reason this is a bad idea. If I do
something in my free time I don't care about getting recognition for it
because my direct work on the project is enough and if someone wants to see
what I do they can check my commit history or blog, however if I commit
I agree to Nyall -
We need sponsors. And sponsors don´t want to be in footnotes fontsize 6.5
Right now I´ve started to get sponsors to the next developer/usermeeting in
Denmark. And I´m sure sponsors will not be satisfied to be put into an appendix.
I think these small textnotes in the mail
I agree with Nathan and Nyall. The commit history isn't a very
official thing, so there is some room for attribution and other
additional information.
Personally I prefer a meaningful commit message with some spam in it
over a commit message that contains (almost) no useful information like
2014-10-10 10:09 GMT+02:00 Lene Fischer l...@ign.ku.dk:
I agree to Nyall –
We need sponsors. And sponsors don´t want to be in footnotes fontsize 6.5
Agreed, see the footer the home page
http://www.qgis.org/it/site/
Right now I´ve started to get sponsors to the next
Considering that one of QGIS' main source of funding for development is
through financial sponsorship of _independent_ developers, I'd be very
careful not to take decisions that would hurt that ecosystem without asking
those independent developers the reasoning behind leaving a trace in the
commit
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
I agree with Nathan and Nyall. The commit history isn't a very
official thing, so there is some room for attribution and other
additional information.
Personally I prefer a meaningful commit message with some spam in
it over a
As Jürgen mentioned, we discussed this:
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_7_Feb_2014
My interpretation is that the PSC agreed on allowing giving credit to
funders in commit messages. Obviously I promised to write something
along these lines in the governance docs, but that might
Chiming in from the perspective of someone who was working for an occasional
feature “sponsor” until recently (mostly GeoServer, but also one or two QGIS),
we didn’t do it with the intent of getting our name in anything (be it commit
log, appendix, or even h1 on the project front-page). We did
Hi Anita,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:26:57 +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
As Jürgen mentioned, we discussed this:
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_7_Feb_2014
My interpretation is that the PSC agreed on allowing giving credit to
funders in commit messages. Obviously I promised to
My guideline in all this would be:
What harm is it doing to need to change what is currently happening? To me
the answer is none.
Provided you don't put it all on one line in the commit log and have it at
the bottom then put what ever you like in there as long as I can see what
was done and by
To make an example, this is a good commit message.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/a132bc9a9e318c2321c8fba13dc9503b4d11e2aa
It states
* which problem it solves
* and what it does exactly
And I could not care less about an additional line at the bottom stating
Funded by John Wayne
-
2014-10-10 11:49 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Anita,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:26:57 +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
As Jürgen mentioned, we discussed this:
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_7_Feb_2014
My interpretation is that the PSC agreed on allowing giving credit to
Do we have a problem? What kind of?
Is a funded (with money) feature more worth than a feature or bugfix
sponsored by a developer's private time?
On 10/10/2014 11:54 AM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
2014-10-10 11:49 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Anita,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at
Hi Giovanni,
On Tue, 07. Oct 2014 at 09:53:30 +0200, G. Allegri wrote:
The problem with missing qscimod4.sip from some Debian/Ubuntu packages
seems to be still an issue. Recently I upgraded to Ubuntu 14.04 and I
cannot sompile the sip parts of Python yet.
14.04 is probably not recent enough
2014-10-10 11:58 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch:
Do we have a problem? What kind of?
There was an IF condition in front of my sentence:
IF every developer starts .
THEN we have a problem
And the problem would be flooding of commit logs with Funded|Sponsored by ...
I can
I personally do not see any problem in having a Sponsored by bottom line
even in every commit message. Maybe not the most correct thing to do, but
it doesn't bother me, just like it doesn't bother me to see the author of
the commit. As long as the first line of the message (which is the one
shown
On 10/10/2014 8:58 pm, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote:
Do we have a problem? What kind of?
Is a funded (with money) feature more worth than a feature or bugfix
sponsored by a developer's private time?
Agreed. If I spend 2 hours of my free time fixing a bug, I think i'd be
entitled
Also we should avoid playing the What If game. It's not normally a good
idea because it's a open ended question. My position is normally fix a
problem when it becomes a problem. (This only applies to non life
threatening situations of course).
- Nathan
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Nyall
On 10 October 2014 21:24, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/10/2014 8:58 pm, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote:
Do we have a problem? What kind of?
Is a funded (with money) feature more worth than a feature or bugfix
sponsored by a developer's private time?
Agreed.
Hi Jürgen,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:26:57 +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
As Jürgen mentioned, we discussed this:
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_7_Feb_2014
My interpretation is that the PSC agreed on allowing
Hi Alessandro,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:54:06 +0200, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
My original complaint was not about occasional big new features fundings (see
regione Toscana or city of Uster) but day-by-day small bug fixes or changes
made by regular committers.
If every developer start
Chris Crook wrote
Hi Walter
When you connect to the PostGis database make sure that you have selected
the Use estimated metadata option - this optimises the connection for
large datasets - see attached screenshot. This should greatly improve the
connection times for postigs. (If you are
Hi Giovanni,
On Wed, 08. Oct 2014 at 11:08:15 +0200, G. Allegri wrote:
This is a question I should ask to Qt lists but I would like to know if
anyone had the need to make QGIS work behind a proxy requiring Negotiate
authentication.
AFAICS the only authentication scheme supported by
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:53:28 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
To make an example, this is a good commit message.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/a132bc9a9e318c2321c8fba13dc9503b4d11e2aa
It states
* which problem it solves
* and what it does exactly
And I could not care
2014-10-10 14:44 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:53:28 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
To make an example, this is a good commit message.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/a132bc9a9e318c2321c8fba13dc9503b4d11e2aa
It states
* which problem it
Hi Jurgen,
I'm not using QgsNetworkAccessManager in my plugin (you meant this, not
QgsNetworkManager right?) but a simple QNetworkProxy with type HttpProxy.
It should be fine for my purposes but it doesn't manage Negotiate. Anyway
QGIS doesn't pass the proxy neither...
giovanni
2014-10-10 14:23
Hi,
for those of you interested in this topic, here is the API I'm working
on for Python bindings:
http://www.itopen.it/qgis/serverplugins/api/annotated.html
The implementation is complete, I'm currently working on a test plugin
and looking for memory leaks and other possible problems.
The
Sandro Santilli-2 wrote
Can you send the whole query ?
I think there's a class of such issues with big tables that need be
addressed (and secured with some automated testcase).
I did it again and - performance is ok - no idea what is going on there. :(
This part of Qgis is for me like a
Hi Alessandro,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-10-10 14:44 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 10. Oct 2014 at 11:53:28 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
To make an example, this is a good commit message.
37 matches
Mail list logo
