Hi Giuseppe,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Giuseppe Sucameli
wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
> I can reproduce the issue you reported, I get segfault following those
> steps.
thank you Giuseppe for having tried it, maybe I am managed to find a fix
for it.
> Please, file a new ticket for it, AFAICS i
Hi Salvatore,
I can reproduce the issue you reported, I get segfault following those
steps.
Please, file a new ticket for it, AFAICS it's not related to the other
issue.
Ciao.
Giuseppe
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM Salvatore Larosa wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tom Ch
Hi all,
I just saw a recent commit labeled "New API for labeling engine
(QgsLabelingEngineV2)" [0]
Can anyone tell us more on that work that seems very promising?
My question is not totally innocent, I just launch funding to start QEP's
work on labeling improvements. I would like that QGIS can h
Wh. that's huge work Larry. Will need quite some time to inspect all that
and give some feedback. Any way , bravo!
Régis
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/New-authentication-system-ready-tp5225486p5225514.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing
Hi,
The authentication system I have been working on for about a year is now
available for testing [PR 2330, QEP 14]. Would like to get people's
opinions on whether I can push this to master for upcoming release (and
maybe a vote on the QEP). Most of the code is bolt-on extra classes or
spliced-in
Hi everybody,
I wonder if someone in this community/forum can explain me what I am going
to describe.
1 - I have an "ecw" raster file with a CRS already defines as "EPSG 102091"
(Monte_Mario_Italy_1). I have create a polygon (I have set the parameter
CRS as "EPSG 102091" too) and I use it as a ma
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Following the steps in Pedro's ticket does *not* crash for me. However, I'll
> ask some questions to clarify:
>
> 1. I did not select "Virtual field", as that was not mentioned in the ticket
I added a comment to the
Hi Bas,
On Tue, 22. Sep 2015 at 14:05:57 +0200, sebastic wrote:
> Is QGIS important enough to hold back GRASS or osgEarth releases?
No. If you don't update the package there will be no need to update QGIS
(because "no one" is going to build the above packages just to see if QGIS
works with them)
On 2015-09-22 13:45, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 22/09/2015 13:41, sebastic ha scritto:
I have to divide my time over many packages, so I can't fully dedicate
it to preparing the next GDAL transition (to 1.11.3 or 2.0.1 if the
reverse dependencies all work with GDAL 2.0). merkaartor was one of
t
Il 22/09/2015 13:41, sebastic ha scritto:
> I have to divide my time over many packages, so I can't fully dedicate
> it to preparing the next GDAL transition (to 1.11.3 or 2.0.1 if the
> reverse dependencies all work with GDAL 2.0). merkaartor was one of the
> packages known not to support GDAL 2.
On 2015-09-22 13:25, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 22/09/2015 10:21, Even Rouault ha scritto:
The EPSG database hasn't been updated in this maintenance release. You
need
GDAL 2.0 for EPSG:6707
Thanks for the clarification. Any idea whether this will land in Debian
and Windows in time for the 2.1
Il 22/09/2015 13:24, Tom Chadwin ha scritto:
> Many apologies - you are right. I change "Layer name", and couldn't
> understand what Display as was meant to be: a non-editable text field which
> mirrors Layer name? Why?
agreed, an old issue, I also do not understant its use.
all the best.
--
Paol
Many apologies - you are right. I change "Layer name", and couldn't
understand what Display as was meant to be: a non-editable text field which
mirrors Layer name? Why?
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Server-Add-a-Short-Name-to-layers-for-OGC-Web-S
Il 22/09/2015 10:21, Even Rouault ha scritto:
> The EPSG database hasn't been updated in this maintenance release. You need
> GDAL 2.0 for EPSG:6707
Thanks for the clarification. Any idea whether this will land in Debian
and Windws in time for the 2.12 release?
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini
Tom Chadwin wrote
> I certainly use "Display as" for human-friendly names.
Hi, I must have missed something. How do you modify that field? It is greyed
out here.
Cheers
Régis
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Server-Add-a-Short-Name-to-layers-for-OGC-We
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Server-Add-a-Short-Name-to-layers-for-OGC-Web-Services-tp5225162p5225394.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Qgis-developer maili
I certainly use "Display as" for human-friendly names.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Server-Add-a-Short-Name-to-layers-for-OGC-Web-Services-tp5225162p5225383.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Hi all,
1. I've had some inconsistent problems with the topology checker
lately (linux, QGIS 2.10.1). I've tested a line-layer with the dangles
option. This layer had been created time ago with arcgis
two-point-line-tool. It showed me a lot of errors/dangles even on
straight lines, where the nodes
Le lundi 21 septembre 2015 17:29:51, Andre Joost a écrit :
> Am 20.09.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
> > On Debian sid we now have proj.4 4.9.2, which should contain also new
> > EPSG codes (namely 6707, and more). How can I get QGIS 2.10 know about
> > it?
>
> The usual way would be to ru
Hi Salvatore
Following the steps in Pedro's ticket does *not* crash for me. However, I'll
ask some questions to clarify:
1. I did not select "Virtual field", as that was not mentioned in the ticket
2. I only gave a static value for the contents o the field, rather than an
expression - does this
20 matches
Mail list logo
