Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues in QGIS Server 2,18

[Nyall Dawson]

On 1 March 2018 at 23:26, René-Luc Dhont  wrote:

> *) At some point in 2.18 development -in the print composer,
> properties of a legend- the "none" value for the "map" option was
> removed. This option (together with "auto update" unchecked) allowed
> to do GetPrint requests where a legend always shown the same fixed
> entries regardless of the layers being requested. Moreover now the
> layers legend (from a GetPrint) frequently shows "?" instead of the
> correct legend. Not sure if the two things are related.
>
>
> It will be great to have the possibility to allow nullptr in the map
> combobox.
> Nyall, do you have an idea how to enhance QgsComposerItemComboBox
> introdiuced by
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/1b4bd47076103e931e642c9c2b6a363f14b20a45
> ?
> Issue already exists: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/16899

I wouldn't do it this way -- it was the hidden nature of the original
support for setting no linked map which led to it being broken (also,
no unit tests -- the combination of a non-obvious reuse of an existing
widget + no unit tests is basically asking for something to break).

I'd suggest instead adding an explicit checkbox here for "always show
all layers for server requests" (but better wording!), under a new
"server settings" group. And a unit test ;)

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.0 plugin dependencies status

[Borys Jurgiel]

Guys,

Unfortunately all I can do now is to book the necessary time this autumn. First 
I have to 
address a few bugfixes in my badly limited time for QGIS.
If nobody makes the QEP before, I'll come back to it after the summer.

Regards,
Borys

Dnia piątek, 2 marca 2018 13:28:09 CET Richard Duivenvoorde pisze:
> On 02-03-18 13:08, David Marteau wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I stumbled on this post:
> > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/A-pipinstall-plugin-is-possible-First
> > -What-s-the-difference-between-the-Osgeo4w-Shell-td5107633.html
> > 
> > What it the status of the problem of plugin dependency  for Qgis3 ?
> > Is there anything done so far ?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> We had a (private) discussion about it during latest hackfest, and Borys
> (in bcc) hopes to be able to address this as part of the plugins install
> overhaul.
> 
> As the discussion (2014?), you are pointing to, mentions pip and virtual
> env's: just yesterday I stumbled upon pipenv [0][1]. Not sure if that
> could be helpful, but apparently it is  a pip-virtualenv marriage...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard Duivenvoorde
> 
> Ps, maybe good to start a QEP [2] to discuss this?
> 
> [0] https://pipenv.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
> [1] http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/dev/virtualenvs/
> [2] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1370] SentinelHub approval notification.

[noreply]

Plugin SentinelHub approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1370] SentinelHub 1.0.3" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SentinelHub/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Qgis3: installing new processing provider via plugins

[David Marteau]

Hi

I can't figure where the the "enable additional providers" option is located in 
Qgis 3 ? 

Or there is another way to enable providers from plugins ?

Thx,
David


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Ctrl Tab in QGIS3: cool! ... but...

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

On 25-02-18 15:14, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> 
> Just heard from Regis that we have have this beautiful Ctrl-Tab, which
> hides the west, south and east panel from QGIS to have a clean map.
> 
> My question is what the reason is to not hide the toolbars.
> Was it too difficult because you have to remember all active toolbars?
> OR was it because the idea is that users still have to be able to reach
> the toolbuttons?
> 
> Because if it is the latter, I would ask a feature request: maybe
> Shift-Ctrl_Tab to also have the toolbars hidden :-)

I have a PR now:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6523

Not so much to pull, but more to discuss. Please add comments there.

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde

ps: SOOO nice to see a full screen map on a large monitor :-)

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

[Nathan Woodrow]

Hey Carlo,

I guess we are a bit confused at the moment because the goal of QGIS has
never really been that at all, at least not post v1.  We have always aimed
to make it the best it can be for a lot of different workflows.

I'm not sure I would consider anything in QGIS a step backwords at all,
There has been a crazy, and I mean crazy, amount of dev work to create a
better product for end users.

- Nathan

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) <
carlo.berte...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No pun intended, when you announced what you were going to do, I used
> MapInfo as my main GIS and Thuban as a viewer and I hoped very much you
> were starting something that was went further.
> Since version 0.11 I was using QGIS as my "main" GIS. What I was saying is
> that the continuous improvement made all users rely on a dependable QGIS.
> Departing from a cautious approach to a very fast development pace means
> users can keep an LTR for day to day working (no advanced needs) and an
> "evolution" approach for the advanced features. I didn't think that saying
> "viewer" I diminished the huge effort of these years. The "viewer" approach
> is still a plus of QGIS and it's not something easy to accomplish if I see
> the work on Processing and what has been done for GRASS. I think being a
> "viewer" for GDAL means getting all of the benefits of an evolving project.
> This has its drawbacks, some processing that is needed at the feature level
> was available only on layers as a whole. I meant that, the last major
> version is a further step that asks for more dependability.
> My apologies for all the developers who felt injured by my words.
> c
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Tim Sutton  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 03 Mar 2018, at 20:43, Jürgen E. Fischer  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 03. Mar 2018 at 12:43:00 +0100, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)
>> wrote:
>>
>> but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires
>> editing
>> abilities by plugins.
>>
>>
>> Was that ever a goal?  If so, I didn't know - but I have been around only
>> for a
>> bit more than 10 years ;)
>>
>>
>> Yeah I think the idea of being a full fledged GIS rather than a simple
>> viewer has been with us for many years already….glad to see it is really
>> taking hold with 3.0 though :-) Great to have your inputs Carlo.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> Jürgen
>>
>> --
>> Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel.
>> +49-4931-918175-31
>> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax.
>> +49-4931-918175-50
>> Software Engineer   D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.
>> de
>> QGIS release manager (PSC)  GermanyIRC: jef on
>> FreeNode
>> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> *Tim Sutton*
>> QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
>> t...@qgis.org
>>
>
> --
> --
> Carlo A. Bertelli
>Charta servizi e sistemi per il territorio e la storia ambientale srl
>   Dipendenze del palazzo Doria,
>   vc. alla Chiesa della Maddalena 9/2 16124  Genova (Italy)
>   tel./fax +39(0)10 2475439  +39 0108566195 <010%20856%206195>
> mobile:+39 393 1590711 <393%20159%200711>
>e-mail: berte...@chartasrl.eu  http://www.chartasrl.eu
> --
>
>
>
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

[Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)]

No pun intended, when you announced what you were going to do, I used
MapInfo as my main GIS and Thuban as a viewer and I hoped very much you
were starting something that was went further.
Since version 0.11 I was using QGIS as my "main" GIS. What I was saying is
that the continuous improvement made all users rely on a dependable QGIS.
Departing from a cautious approach to a very fast development pace means
users can keep an LTR for day to day working (no advanced needs) and an
"evolution" approach for the advanced features. I didn't think that saying
"viewer" I diminished the huge effort of these years. The "viewer" approach
is still a plus of QGIS and it's not something easy to accomplish if I see
the work on Processing and what has been done for GRASS. I think being a
"viewer" for GDAL means getting all of the benefits of an evolving project.
This has its drawbacks, some processing that is needed at the feature level
was available only on layers as a whole. I meant that, the last major
version is a further step that asks for more dependability.
My apologies for all the developers who felt injured by my words.
c

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Tim Sutton  wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 03 Mar 2018, at 20:43, Jürgen E. Fischer  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 03. Mar 2018 at 12:43:00 +0100, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)
> wrote:
>
> but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires
> editing
> abilities by plugins.
>
>
> Was that ever a goal?  If so, I didn't know - but I have been around only
> for a
> bit more than 10 years ;)
>
>
> Yeah I think the idea of being a full fledged GIS rather than a simple
> viewer has been with us for many years already….glad to see it is really
> taking hold with 3.0 though :-) Great to have your inputs Carlo.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> Jürgen
>
> --
> Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
> Software Engineer   D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.
> de
> QGIS release manager (PSC)  GermanyIRC: jef on FreeNode
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *Tim Sutton*
> QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
> t...@qgis.org
>

-- 
--
Carlo A. Bertelli
   Charta servizi e sistemi per il territorio e la storia ambientale srl
  Dipendenze del palazzo Doria,
  vc. alla Chiesa della Maddalena 9/2 16124  Genova (Italy)
  tel./fax +39(0)10 2475439  +39 0108566195 <010%20856%206195>
mobile:+39 393 1590711 <393%20159%200711>
   e-mail: berte...@chartasrl.eu  http://www.chartasrl.eu
--
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer