[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1370] SentinelHub approval notification.

Plugin SentinelHub approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1370] SentinelHub 1.3.1" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SentinelHub/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [956] Socrata approval notification.

Plugin Socrata approval by pcav. The plugin version "[956] Socrata 2.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Socrata/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS on Windows7?

Inviato da iPhone > Il giorno 04 mag 2018, alle ore 01:24, Nyall Dawson > ha scritto: > > I (and many others at a workplace I maintain) use it very frequently > on Windows 7 without issue. I confirm this. I run the 3 version successfully on Win 7 64 bit. Roberto

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Length measurement weirdness (again)

It was always my impression that these measurements can never be that accurate as the projections are approximated? Or do you know otherwise? On 04/05/18 11:18, Nyall Dawson wrote: On 3 May 2018 at 23:26, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Hi all, the measurements of a EPSG:4326

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Last Call: edit entries in Visual Changelog 3.0!

On 3 May 2018 at 18:40, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 03-05-18 07:36, Nyall Dawson wrote: >> On 1 May 2018 at 17:33, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: >>> Hi Nyall, >>> >>> You hit a bug I think. Only staff members see the star (attached). >>> >>> Besides

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing options broken in QGIS LTR 2.18.19 (?)

On 3 May 2018 at 19:36, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi all, > >> It doesn't help 2.18, but unit tests are the fix here. At least in 3.0 >> the whole of processing core is totally soaked in unit tests. >> >> I'm going to be submitting a grant proposal to start adding gui

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS on Windows7?

On 3 May 2018 at 18:34, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > > Hi, > > Wondering if anybody has Windows7 machines with running QGIS 3.x > installations. I (and many others at a workplace I maintain) use it very frequently on Windows 7 without issue. Nyall > > Issue #18794 has

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Length measurement weirdness (again)

On 3 May 2018 at 23:26, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Hi all, > the measurements of a EPSG:4326 line appear correct in any SRS, both > with the interactive info tool and writing on the table the value of > $length, *if* the OTF reprojection is active (including 4326). > If it is

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Length measurement weirdness (again)

Have you noticed this in the measure tool info box part?: - if OTF is off: The calculations are based on: Project CRS transformation is turned off. Distance is calculated in degrees, based on project CRS (WGS84). Ellipsoidal calculation is not possible with CRS transformation disabled. Distance

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Hi Trying to answer Mathias's questions: Since I have no idea how it works exactly and what's possible to do with > it, could you quickly describe how it's working together with other > issue trackers? Some features that interesting (at least to me): 1. If there is a bug, you can assign

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Length measurement weirdness (again)

Il 03/05/2018 15:26, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: > Hi all, > the measurements of a EPSG:4326 line appear correct in any SRS, both > with the interactive info tool and writing on the table the value of > $length, *if* the OTF reprojection is active (including 4326). > If it is not, the result is

[QGIS-Developer] SAGA algorithms not usable in Modeler

Hi devs, I tested several SAGA algorithms within a Modeler. Even with very very simple models (one layer - one algorithm) every SAGA algorithm I tested I get a stacktrace. If someone can confirm this I think this could be a serious trouble (Tested on Linux - QGIS master compiled version) Cheers

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1361] Virtual Raster Builder approval notification.

Plugin Virtual Raster Builder approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1361] Virtual Raster Builder 0.4" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/vrtbuilderplugin/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [897] RiverGIS approval notification.

Plugin RiverGIS approval by pcav. The plugin version "[897] RiverGIS 3.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/rivergis/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [499] CalcArea approval notification.

Plugin CalcArea approval by pcav. The plugin version "[499] CalcArea 1.2.1" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CalcArea/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Il 03/05/2018 14:01, Etienne Trimaille ha scritto: > Having Sentry on a few Python projects, I agree it's a very nice tool to > have for debugging. It shows you new bug, bugs which should be fixed but > occurs again, etc. > It would be nice to have it in QGIS I think. you look the perfect

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Hi, I have no experience with Sentry. I just gave it a superquick try and it looks interesting indeed. Since I have no idea how it works exactly and what's possible to do with it, could you quickly describe how it's working together with other issue trackers? Thanks Matthias On 05/03/2018

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Having Sentry on a few Python projects, I agree it's a very nice tool to have for debugging. It shows you new bug, bugs which should be fixed but occurs again, etc. It would be nice to have it in QGIS I think. 2018-05-03 7:31 GMT-04:00 Patrick Valsecchi < patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com>: > Hi,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Hi, Would be very useful for QGIS server. Good idea! CU On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Hey Tim, > > I added a crash handler in 3.0 for Windows at least and it lead to a few > good fixes. I will checkout the stuff you posted to see if we can >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS on Windows7?

I personally haven't but I will comment that Windows 7 is out of mainstream support and you can't expect your component suppliers to be obligated to continue supporting it. It's like saying Ubuntu Lucid can run this version of Qgis and be supported with it. As we all know only the more recent

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Compiling QGIS 3 on Centos 7

Hi again, Seems like CentOS 7.5 (release due soon) comes with qt 5.9.2 - just have to be patient a bit and hope that all other dependencies will also be more up-to-date. As an example, CentOS 7.4 only comes with GDAL 1.11 - they are very conservative! Andreas On 2018-05-03 11:32, Andreas

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing options broken in QGIS LTR 2.18.19 (?)

Hi all, > It doesn't help 2.18, but unit tests are the fix here. At least in 3.0 > the whole of processing core is totally soaked in unit tests. > > I'm going to be submitting a grant proposal to start adding gui unit > tests to processing. That's now the most fragile part of the > processing

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Compiling QGIS 3 on Centos 7

Hi Richard, Yeah - CentOS7 is currently stuck with qt 5.6 I probably have to give up on getting QGIS server 3 to run on CentOS7 :-( The only way would be a dockerized version of QGIS server 3 - or I can convince our IT-department to switch to a more modern distro. Thanks anyway, Andreas

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Compiling QGIS 3 on Centos 7

On 02-05-18 17:40, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Did someone successfully compile QGIS 3 on Centos 7? > > Or are there any recent QGIS 3 server packages available for Centos 7? I > don't need 3d or desktop on this machine - only server. > > While I can find qt5 packages for centos 7, several

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Last Call: edit entries in Visual Changelog 3.0!

On 03-05-18 07:36, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 1 May 2018 at 17:33, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: >> Hi Nyall, >> >> You hit a bug I think. Only staff members see the star (attached). >> >> Besides my own (staff) account I created a zuidt (non staff) account, >> and only the staff

[QGIS-Developer] QGIS on Windows7?

Hi, Wondering if anybody has Windows7 machines with running QGIS 3.x installations. Issue #18794 has problems on a Win7-64 machine and is wondering if it is that combi that is a problem? If people installed it on Win7-64 succesfully it should be a local problem. I already pointed him to:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-user] New WEB Suite for QGIS - G3W-SUITE

Hi Luca, Il 02/05/2018 16:30, Luca Manganelli ha scritto: On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Walter Lorenzetti > wrote: Hi users, hi developers, I am pleasure to introduce you a new suite to publish QGIS projects on web by

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Hey Tim, I added a crash handler in 3.0 for Windows at least and it lead to a few good fixes. I will checkout the stuff you posted to see if we can intergrate it into what I already have there. Nathan On Thu, 3 May 2018, 4:43 pm Tim Sutton, wrote: > Hi All > > > For many

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing options broken in QGIS LTR 2.18.19 (?)

On 3 May 2018 at 16:49, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Thanks Giovanni for checking. This kind of issues, in LTR minor > releases, are particularly undesirable. We had already a few instances > like this. Does anyone have ideas or suggestions on what we can do to > prevent it? >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing options broken in QGIS LTR 2.18.19 (?)

Thanks Giovanni for checking. This kind of issues, in LTR minor releases, are particularly undesirable. We had already a few instances like this. Does anyone have ideas or suggestions on what we can do to prevent it? All the best. Il 02/05/2018 22:11, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto: > this is the

[QGIS-Developer] Sentry support for QGIS crashes / minidumps

Hi All For many years we have used sentry (http://sentry.io) in our python projects to systematically collect, review and prioritise issues raised in our python projects. Sentry.io is open source (plus they offer a commercially hosted service). At Kartoza we run our own instance under docker