On 7 June 2018 at 08:48, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Il 06/06/2018 12:55, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
>> Hi Nyall, Primin, others:
>>
>> Il 06/06/2018 11:50, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>>
>>> While we are discussing this - I'd also like to seem the same logic
>>> applied to the OpenLayers
Hi all,
Il 06/06/2018 12:55, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> Hi Nyall, Primin, others:
>
> Il 06/06/2018 11:50, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>
>> While we are discussing this - I'd also like to seem the same logic
>> applied to the OpenLayers plugin. That plugin has very serious issues,
>> more so
Thanks a lot Ismail and Tim!
Regards,
Régis
2018-06-06 21:10 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton :
> Hi All
>
> Ismail Sunni has patched the changelog - it no longer requires moderation
> for categories, versions & entries. I hope that makes the process much
> smoother now!
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
> On 05 Jun
Hi All
Ismail Sunni has patched the changelog - it no longer requires moderation for
categories, versions & entries. I hope that makes the process much smoother
now!
Regards
Tim
> On 05 Jun 2018, at 08:57, Tim Sutton wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the kind comments. We
On 2018-06-06 12:59, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 06/06/2018 11:22, DelazJ ha scritto:
I'd be in favor of fixing the current issue of freeze while
deprecating
it with a message in its description (in Plugin Manager) inviting
potential users to migrate to the alternatives.
+1
But then I think,
Il 06/06/2018 11:22, DelazJ ha scritto:
> Agreed with Loïc. We often claim and try (Paolo?) to avoid redundant
> plugins. If in this case there are (better?) alternatives, we should not
> revive the plugin imho.
> I'd be in favor of fixing the current issue of freeze while deprecating
> it with
Hi Richard,
Il 06/06/2018 11:39, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
> Well, no offence either, but I think humans in general are conservative
> and like habits and structure :-)
>
> So Matthias' (probably valid) point is: now we deprecated the (old
> Rectangles-Ovals-Digitizing plugin), people
Alexander Bruy wrote
> 2018-06-06 12:50 GMT+03:00 Nyall Dawson
> nyall.dawson@
> :
>> I'd be very much in favour of deprecating the OpenLayers plugin and
>> marking it with a "install QuickMapServices" instead warning.
>
> Maybe better to point to core fucntionality than yet another plugin?
Hi Nyall, Primin, others:
Il 06/06/2018 11:50, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> While we are discussing this - I'd also like to seem the same logic
> applied to the OpenLayers plugin. That plugin has very serious issues,
> more so than the Rectangles/ plugin (since OpenLayers can cause data
>
@ Richard Duivenvoorde :
I am talking about the Rectangles Ovals Digitizing plugin (
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/rectovalDigit/ )
Current version is 1.1.2
The code is currently available at
https://github.com/vinayan/RectOvalDigitPlugin
The author itself ( Pavol Kapusta ) is ok with the
2018-06-06 12:50 GMT+03:00 Nyall Dawson :
> I'd be very much in favour of deprecating the OpenLayers plugin and
> marking it with a "install QuickMapServices" instead warning.
Maybe better to point to core fucntionality than yet another plugin?
--
Alexander Bruy
On 5 June 2018 at 23:44, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> From my point of view, this patch should be shipped even without a
> general overhaul.
> The plugin in use and probably causing data loss, reducing productivity
> and giving bad reputation for QGIS (I guess many are not aware that it's
> actually
On 2018-06-06 11:13, L.Bartoletti wrote:
Not for me :)
I maintain only my fork (CADDigitize), and I preferer work on cad
integration into qgis :)
No offense to my question, but why use this plugin again, since
CADDigitize or QAD (and maybe others) do the same job (better) and
more?
Regards
In the fixed version of the plugin I have written in the about section:
"about=THIS PLUGIN IS NO LONGER ACTIVELY MAINTAINED. PLEASE USE CADDIGITIZE
INSTEAD: https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CADDigitize/;
So the idea behind the update is just to fix the problem for the users who
have installed the
Hi,
Should we not take the occasion to get rid of this plugin
2018-06-06 11:13 GMT+02:00 L.Bartoletti :
>
>
> No offense to my question, but why use this plugin again, since
> CADDigitize or QAD (and maybe others) do the same job (better) and more?
>
> Agreed with Loïc. We often claim and try
The main other issue with it is if I have a form that I need to fill in
the fields on, that doesn't pop up when you rightclick. You have to go
find it in the table and then fill the fields in.
On 06/06/18 20:34, Thomas Baumann wrote:
Am Di., 5. Juni 2018 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Loïc Bartoletti
Not for me :)
I maintain only my fork (CADDigitize), and I preferer work on cad
integration into qgis :)
No offense to my question, but why use this plugin again, since
CADDigitize or QAD (and maybe others) do the same job (better) and more?
Regards
Loïc
On 06.06.2018 10:48, Richard
On 2018-06-06 10:34, Thomas Baumann wrote:
Am Di., 5. Juni 2018 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Loïc Bartoletti
:
Hi,
I forked it some years ago since it wasn't maintained, see
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CADDigitize/
FYI, it's integrated into QGIS 3.
Regards
Loïc
NOW I TRIED TO UPLOAD A NEW
Am Di., 5. Juni 2018 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Loïc Bartoletti <
lbartole...@tuxfamily.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I forked it some years ago since it wasn't maintained, see
> https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CADDigitize/
>
> FYI, it's integrated into QGIS 3.
>
> Regards
>
> Loïc
>
Hi,
good to know that there
Plugin QNEAT3 approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1476] QNEAT3 1.0.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/QNEAT3/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
20 matches
Mail list logo
