Plugin Serval approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[913] Serval 3.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Serval/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Not yet confirmed a dedicated workshop focused on writing QGIS
documentation, so, again, your help is welcome.
see you in A Coruña
Luigi Pirelli
**
* LinkedIn:
Hi Veronica,
>From your report, it seems that the data type has some influence in this
issue.
I'm forwarding this thread to developer mailing list, as it seems more
apropriate.
Best regards,
Pedro
Na(o) qui, 10/01/2019, 16:58, Veronica Andreo
escreveu:
> Hi Pedro and all,
>
> Many thanks
Hi all,
I want to raise some proposal for the documentation process of QGIS. I
think that we can all agree that the documentation is our weak part: no
matters if we have some budget or not, but even with sponsors, docs are
months away to be up to date with the code. We have an endless list of
For me it's perfectly fine if the PSC member calls for the nominations.
I prefer the nominations to be public, for the reason Jorge mentioned:
encouraging more people to make nominations.
But first of all, I'd organize voting for nominated candidates instead of just
counting private
For me it's perfectly fine if the PSC member calls for the nominations.
I prefer the nominations to be public, for the reason Jorge mentioned:
encouraging more people to make nominations.
But first of all, I'd organize voting for nominated candidates instead of just
counting private
Hi Paolo,
I don't see this process as a problem, but as an opportunity to build a
better community. That's why this process exist, to recognize and reward
the most dedicated members.
I would put the question in the other way: why can't we make the
nominations public from the start? Is it a
Hi Will
On 10/01/19 17:52, William Roper wrote:
> Hello QGIS dev list,
>
> This is a general question about attending the QGIS Developer Conference
> in Coruña in March. I don't have any experience with C++, and so wanted
> to see if that was the exclusive focus, or if there will be work being
>
Hello QGIS dev list,
This is a general question about attending the QGIS Developer Conference in
Coruña in March. I don't have any experience with C++, and so wanted to see
if that was the exclusive focus, or if there will be work being carried out
on in Python and on the Documentation where I
Hi all,
so are you suggesting that:
* the call for nominations should be done by a non PSC member (now it's
a PSC member doing this)
* make nominations public from the start (we currently disclose them
after collecting them).
For the first one I frankly don't see any issue.
For the second one,
Yes, it's what I had in mind :)
Dnia czwartek, 10 stycznia 2019 15:09:18 CET Jorge Gustavo Rocha pisze:
> Hi,
>
> May I join the discussion?
>
> The OSGeo does this same process [1] every year. I think we can take
> advantage of the experience and use a similar procedure, which is
> absolutely
Hi Tom,
On 10/01/19 13:51, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> - Is anyone prepared to take a look at the codebase
> (https://github.com/tomchadwin/qgis2web/)to give a more authoritative
> opinion on whether a refactor would benefit the plugin (specifically with a
> view to making it easier for other devs to
Hi Jurgen,
GRASS Plugin is back again to nightly builds! Checked in QGIS 3.4.3-12 and
2.18.27-4.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Pedro
Pedro Venâncio escreveu no dia quarta,
9/01/2019 à(s) 18:34:
> Hi Jurgen,
>
> That's correct! I found the problem using GRASS in Processing, and just
Hi,
May I join the discussion?
The OSGeo does this same process [1] every year. I think we can take
advantage of the experience and use a similar procedure, which is
absolutely transparent.
Every year a CRO [2] is nominated to run the process as independent as
possible (from the board/PSC), the
Plugin agknow for QGIS approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1584] agknow for QGIS 0.7.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/agknow_qgis/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Thanks Tim!
Looking for candidates is not exactly what I mean. I rather wonder if public
nominations and then voting on them wouldn't be more transparent and
encouraging to participate.
Regards,
Borys
Dnia wtorek, 8 stycznia 2019 12:11:08 CET Tim Sutton pisze:
> Hi Borys
>
> Simple answer
Hello all
Since all the work to convert qgis2web for QGIS3, I've done very little work
on the plugin. There is a growing list of issues, and I can't guarantee that
I'll get back to the amount of time I used to be able to put into it. I put
a shout-out on Twitter
This WFS regression here is also pretty bad;
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20808
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:36 PM Uros Preloznik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to point to couple of issues regarding WFS for latest QGIS Server
> that I think need to be fixed before it can be ready for production (next
Plugin agknow for QGIS approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1584] agknow for QGIS 0.7.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/agknow_qgis/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
19 matches
Mail list logo
