Re: [QGIS-Developer] Official PSC call on pull request policies

Hi all, > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Thanks Nyall for raising this thread! > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:21:05AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > >> Policy #1: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/56062 >> >> In short, Sandro proposes that the pull request queue be an open queue >> of ALL work

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Plugins Mechanism

Hi Olga These plugins are maintained by each of the plugin's developers and not by the project. It is up to them to ensure any dependency conflicts are managed. Therefore, if you find any issues, you should contact the plugin developers and put in bugs on their GitHub pages. A link to contact them

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Official PSC call on pull request policies

Thanks for the clarification Nyall, as Andreas wrote we'll discuss it next Tuesday at PSC and will get back to you short after. Cheers Marco On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, 00:07 Nyall Dawson, wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 08:49, Marco Bernasocchi wrote: > >> Thanks Nyall, thanks Sandro, >> >>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Official PSC call on pull request policies

On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 08:49, Marco Bernasocchi wrote: > Thanks Nyall, thanks Sandro, > > Just a quick question, is the > -is:draft > Filter an option at all? I guess it does not reduce the n/r by default but > could help? > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+-is%3Adraft >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Official PSC call on pull request policies

Thanks Nyall, thanks Sandro, Just a quick question, is the -is:draft Filter an option at all? I guess it does not reduce the n/r by default but could help? https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+-is%3Adraft Cheers Marco On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, 23:09 Sandro Santilli via QGIS-PSC,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 02:55, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 2/27/24 8:17 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > Hmm, would it be possible to do the export again? I noticed a few extra > entries were added overnight too, and these aren't present on the site. > (Plus a few wording improvements I made this

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Official PSC call on pull request policies

Thanks Nyall for raising this thread! On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:21:05AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Policy #1: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/56062 > > In short, Sandro proposes that the pull request queue be an open queue > of ALL work happening everywhere, in any state of completeness.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

On 2/27/24 8:17 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: Hmm, would it be possible to do the export again? I noticed a few extra entries were added overnight too, and these aren't present on the site. (Plus a few wording improvements I made this morning too).. Yep, no problem. Please let me know Richard

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

We are in the process of building a new website, I think you're right we should simplify the roadmap page and communicate more on the binary release date than on source code in our phrasing. As for external communication, indeed many posts are launched individually when source code is branched. I

[QGIS-Developer] How QGIS handles on-the-fly projection?

Hi! I’m looking to understand in a more advanced way how QGIS handles on-the-fly projection. In my case I set the project crs in epsg:3857 and I have a raster layer in epsg:4326. In this case what is happening with the layer? I know that it’s based on PROJ, but I’m wondering what is actually

[QGIS-Developer] QGIS Plugins Mechanism

Hi! I want to ask a question related to plugins that are already integrated in QGIS. Aren't there any dependency conflicts, how you solve those conflicts and how that plugins interact with QGIS Desktop internally, by using requests or something similar?

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Access to shapeDigitizeToolBar menu's text

Hi Luke, As you can see on the printed text, objects are QWigetAction, not QAction. This is because you get each category of the tool bar, where then each one contains one or more digitizing QActions. Here is a snippet that can help you explore the tool bar: sdtb =

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

Hi, On Tue, 27. Feb 2024 at 09:39:23 +0100, Luca Manganelli via QGIS-Developer wrote: > Good morning, > > according to the QGIS roadmap, I see that the 3.34 LTR release is on 23th > february, but on the site I see that the latest LTR is still 3.28 Quoting the website (right above the roadmap):

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

Hi Régis, Luca, list, I think some of the confusion might be over the term of "Release". I read this as release of the binaries, i.e. something we can download and install from the QGIS website as a user. From what you said Luca, it seems you view "Release" as release of the source code

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

Thank you for your response. Yes, I suggest you to indicate that the date are only suggested. See this example for LibreOffice: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan there's a column for the Freeze and one for Publishing, with a range of dates and not a fixed day. Il giorno mar 27

[QGIS-Developer] Problems with text when exporting to SVG from composer

Hi all, Some months ago there was a discussion on the french qgis user group about problems with svg export in QGIS. This is a follow-up to this discussion but centered on text, because it seemed better to

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

Hi Luca, as always, there is a delay between source code releases events, and the packaging can only start, as per https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#release QGIS website indicates that packaging is on its way. Official communication including the changelog and

[QGIS-Developer] Qgis 3.34.4 LTR ?

Good morning, according to the QGIS roadmap, I see that the 3.34 LTR release is on 23th february, but on the site I see that the latest LTR is still 3.28 -- Comune di Trento  via Belenzani, 19 - 38122 Trento | C.F e P. IVA: 00355870221 tel. +39 0461.884111 | www.comune.trento.it

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Another (final?) qt6 progress catchup?

Hi Matthias, On Mon, 12. Feb 2024 at 08:11:32 +0100, Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-Developer wrote: > I had a bit of fun over the weekend trying to build QGIS with Qt6 for > Windows (unfortunately no executable yet), and would be interested in > joining. Did you run into the gperf issue? Where gperf