Re: [QGIS-Developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-10-04 Thread Patrick Dunford
/db_manager/CMakeFiles/zzz-db_manager-15-depend.dir/all] Error 2 Makefile:162: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python *gordon at shieldaig.com*gordon at shieldaig.com<mailto:q

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-12 Thread gordon
In summary, the apparent issue seems to have resulted from using `sudo pip3 install PyQt5` at some point as the latest version of it depends on Qt 5.7.1 while `sudo apt-get install python3-pyqt5` depends on Qt 5.6.1 and the symbolic link to `libQt5Core.so.5` points to 5.6.1. Simply removing

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-10 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Gordon, On Thu, 09. Feb 2017 at 11:40:41 -0500, gor...@shieldaig.com wrote: > Thanks Jürgen. I see your approach. I have done it with other > packages but am not sure why I cannot get `pyqt5-dev` and > `pyqt5-dev-tools` 5.6.1 version directly from the `repo` as it did > exist last year.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-09 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 10 February 2017 at 12:26, wrote: > This is what I changed to get what I had to build on Ubuntu 16.10. I am > using the free open source version of Qt directly from their website. > I hate to say this ... but I think your Ubuntu install must be in a mess! It's really

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-09 Thread gordon
This is what I changed to get what I had to build on Ubuntu 16.10. I am using the free open source version of Qt directly from their website. 1. I used the Qt Maintenance tool to install a local copy of Qt 5.7.1, to be consistent with `pyqt5-dev`, `pyqt5-dev-tools` and some other python

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-09 Thread gordon
Thanks Jürgen. I see your approach. I have done it with other packages but am not sure why I cannot get `pyqt5-dev` and `pyqt5-dev-tools` 5.6.1 version directly from the `repo` as it did exist last year. That would be the simplest solution. I am not sure how other people managed to use

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-09 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Gordon, On Wed, 08. Feb 2017 at 18:01:52 -0500, gor...@shieldaig.com wrote: > This is what I discovered. > > On Ubuntu 16.10 the following packages: `pyqt5-dev pyqt5-dev-tools > pyqt5.qsci-dev` seem to be the Qt 5.7 version. > I removed them and reinstalled to confirm. Then I deleted the

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-08 Thread gordon
This is what I discovered. On Ubuntu 16.10 the following packages: `pyqt5-dev pyqt5-dev-tools pyqt5.qsci-dev` seem to be the Qt 5.7 version. I removed them and reinstalled to confirm. Then I deleted the build folder and started over. The build stops at 95% and doing a further `make qgis

Re: [Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-07 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 8 February 2017 at 13:49, wrote: > Due to previous error, mentioned in a early post, I installed `geos 3.6.1` > and because build still failed, I place header file `geos_c.h` in > src/core/geometry folder and replace `` with `"geos_c.h"` in > `qgsgeometry.h`. This may

[Qgis-developer] Building QGIS2.99 cloned from GitHub on Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) 64-bit Python

2017-02-07 Thread gordon
Due to previous error, mentioned in a early post, I installed `geos 3.6.1` and because build still failed, I place header file `geos_c.h` in src/core/geometry folder and replace `` with `"geos_c.h"` in `qgsgeometry.h`. This may not have been necessary but I wanted to make it clear which