,
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paolo Cavallini
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 1:12 PM
To: Lynton Cox
Cc: qgis-user; qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Better tags
To: Lynton Cox
Cc: qgis-user; qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Better tags for plugins
Hi Lynton,
Il 19/02/2015 19:21, Lynton Cox ha scritto:
Please don't forget the newbies need to know exactly what plugins
might be used for - some have hardly any description. Once out
I was referring to manual vetting.
TSW
On Feb 23, 2015 7:49 AM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-23 15:41 GMT+01:00 Trevor Wiens tsw@gmail.com:
In my experience Paulo has been doing good job of encouraging
developers to
do just that.
If we want to formalize it
2015-02-23 16:18 GMT+01:00 Frank M. Howell frankmhow...@gmail.com:
My two cents...I understand the validation requirements. But I think the
fundamental problem is those plugin authors who submit a plugin for X and
then describe it thusly: This is a plugin for X where X is the same name as
2015-02-23 15:41 GMT+01:00 Trevor Wiens tsw@gmail.com:
In my experience Paulo has been doing good job of encouraging developers to
do just that.
If we want to formalize it further it might be a good idea to set the
requirements lower for experimental plugins as it happens to be a helpful
Hi Lynton,
Il 19/02/2015 19:21, Lynton Cox ha scritto:
Please don't forget the newbies need to know exactly what plugins
might be used for - some have hardly any description. Once out of the
basic QGIS manual finding one's way around isnt that easy. Many
amateurs in areas such as local
