I'm sorry to be the one opening this door (this time) and, OFC, I fully
understand a big "No" as an answer.
I have created icons for QGIS files. I have started to create them only for
the main file formats and then extended for data files as well. I have gathered
opinions from others in UX
I read the PR and I saw it was stopped for days for problems not
related with the PR itself, btw was your resonsability to rise the
attention before the feature freeze (you did 10 minutes later!). IMHO
it could be included especially if it was already discussed with the
UX group.
my 2c
Luigi
On Jan 16, 2016 8:36 PM, "Luigi Pirelli" wrote:
>
> I read the PR and I saw it was stopped for days for problems not
> related with the PR itself, btw was your resonsability to rise the
> attention before the feature freeze (you did 10 minutes later!). IMHO
> it could be
Hi all,
Would it be possible to take a decision for this before it's too late?
Shall I get the approval of a PSC member?
Of the release manager?
Best wishes,
Denis
On 30.01.2015 08:33, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to ask for a feature freeze exception for PR #1870 Allow
Hi
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would like to ask for a feature freeze exception for PR #1870 Allow
order features by value for relation reference widget [0].
[0] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1870
To me this looks quite safe to
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Would it be possible to take a decision for this before it's too late?
Shall I get the approval of a PSC member?
Of the release manager?
Imho, it would be best if Jürgen could make a statement on whether
Hi Denis,
I think the last word in this case is with Jürgen as Release manager.
If he considers the changes as reliable and stable enough..
regards
Werner
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Would it be possible to take a decision for this
Dear all,
I would like to draw your attention again on these 2 pull requests :
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1759
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1753
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1759
Based on previous mails and feedbacks, I had the feeling everything was OK
for merging before
Hi..
If it does not affect or break other code everything related to water gets
a big fat
+1
From me.. Please include
Regards
Werner
On January 30, 2015 8:34:01 AM Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to ask for a feature freeze exception for PR #1870 Allow
Hi,
I would also support including this as part of an exception - as we will
also need this for our waste-water system we are developing.
Andreas
On 30.01.2015 09:03, Werner Macho wrote:
Hi..
If it does not affect or break other code everything related to water
gets a big fat
+1
From
Dear all,
I would like to ask for a feature freeze exception for PR #1870 Allow
order features by value for relation reference widget [0].
I have been developping for quite some time a data model and QGIS module
for managing a water network in QGIS.
The module is about to be distributed to
On 26 April 2013 19:26, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:
+1 from me too
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin nirvn.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since blend modes are found everywhere else
(vector,raster,label,composer items), an exception to allow addition
of blend mode on the
+1 from me too
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin nirvn.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Since blend modes are found everywhere else
(vector,raster,label,composer items), an exception to allow addition
of blend mode on the only remaining gap would make sense.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:56
+1 from me.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.comwrote:
I realise we're well and truly past feature freeze now, but I've had a
few requests for adding a blend mode option to the map overview
control. This would be a very small, uncomplicated addition. If I
Since blend modes are found everywhere else
(vector,raster,label,composer items), an exception to allow addition
of blend mode on the only remaining gap would make sense.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM,
Hi all,
I realise I missed the feature freeze by a couple of hours, but I'm
hoping an exception can be made for this pull request:
https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/493
Basically, this adds blending modes for composer items (in line with
the recent addition of blend modes for layers
Hi
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I realise I missed the feature freeze by a couple of hours, but I'm
hoping an exception can be made for this pull request:
https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/493
Basically, this adds blending modes
Nyall, those are really great additions.
When you have a minute, you should look at a blend modes issue I spotted
and described over here: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7461
Cheers.
Math
On 1 Apr 2013 18:14, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I realise I missed the feature
On 1 April 2013 22:33, Mathieu Pellerin nirvn.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Nyall, those are really great additions.
When you have a minute, you should look at a blend modes issue I spotted and
described over here: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7461
Will do... I was just trying to beat the feature
Hi Tim, hi All,
Last time Martin switched the plugin manager to only use metadata.txt instead
of __init__.py , and now I'm updating installer to use the same.
Old plugins without metadata.txt are not displayed in the manager, however
they are available in installer (because it doesn't know
Hey Borys,
I would see this more as a bug fix then a new feature.
- Nathan
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Borys Jurgiel li...@borysjurgiel.pl wrote:
Hi Tim, hi All,
Last time Martin switched the plugin manager to only use metadata.txt
instead
of __init__.py , and now I'm updating
Hi
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Borys,
I would see this more as a bug fix then a new feature.
Yes same here, Borys this would fall under consistency and clean up
leading up to the release.
Regards
Tim
- Nathan
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at
22 matches
Mail list logo