Hi all,
I find I'm often adding layers to a map solely for labelling, and
having to set the symbology for these layers to a 100% transparent
symbol so that the features themselves aren't shown.
This seems rather hacky and inefficient, since QGIS is still rendering
these feature, they just aren't
Hi,
I like the idea of the no symbols renderer. Probably the easiest of
the proposed solutions for the user.
Andreas
Am 30.06.2014 12:38, schrieb Nyall Dawson:
Hi all,
I find I'm often adding layers to a map solely for labelling, and
having to set the symbology for these layers to a 100%
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating a ELSE rule with a no-symbol layer to keep track of nb
of features not rendered.).
Math
On 30 Jun 2014 19:38, Nyall Dawson
Hi,
excellent idea if we get speed improvement !
I don't have QGIS running here right now, but I remember having seen a no
symbol checkbox in rule based renderer. If we look for consistant UI, we
should have the same checkbox for classical renderers on symbol level. I
remember being puzzled when
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating a ELSE rule with a no-symbol layer to keep track of nb
of features not rendered.).
You can already have no symbol for a rule.
Ahh, one learns everyday. When checked, are the labels still drawn?
On 1 Jul 2014 06:36, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd vote for the last option as it'd be compatible with rule based
symbology, which could be useful when coupled with the [x] show layer count
(simple eg creating
