Hi
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
> I mean 1.6 branch, sorry.
>
> Radim
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
>> Cannot you just create a 1.5 _branch_, not yet the 1.5.0 tag (in SVN terms)?
>> With the rule that all fixes must be merged to trunk.
>>
In the
I mean 1.6 branch, sorry.
Radim
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
> Cannot you just create a 1.5 _branch_, not yet the 1.5.0 tag (in SVN terms)?
> With the rule that all fixes must be merged to trunk.
>
> Radim
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
>> Hi folks.
I just tested with the most recent nightly windows build (build 14528, qt
4.5.2) and the issue that one clicks on a checkbox of a layer and nothing
happens still exists.
One has to turn the layer off and on and off to turn it off. This is not
the case for all layers, but for some.
I heard that ot
Cannot you just create a 1.5 _branch_, not yet the 1.5.0 tag (in SVN terms)?
With the rule that all fixes must be merged to trunk.
Radim
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi folks...
>
> We need to press ahead with the release as soon as possible.
>
> It would not be good to st
Hi,
I don't know if the branching already happened and I am in no position to
influence you developers about when to branch - but I would like to know
if the issues around nested grouping and more powerful re-arranging of
groups and layers are properly tested and bugs resolved?
If not - I would l
Hi,
2010/11/7 Paolo Cavallini :
...
> I'm updating the GUI translation, hope to finish it by this evening. Anyway I
> do not
> think we should stop for this, so +1, if not for a regression I think we
> should fix
> before the release, if it's a general phenomenon:
> switching layers off does not
Il 07/11/2010 13:16, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Hi folks...
>
> We need to press ahead with the release as soon as possible.
>
> It would not be good to start the hackfest while the freeze is still in
> effect.
>
> Can you please +1 this message if you are happy to release or otherwise
> provide a
Hi Tim
+1 for branching
Marco
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 13.16:23 schrieb Tim Sutton:
> Hi folks...
>
> We need to press ahead with the release as soon as possible.
>
> It would not be good to start the hackfest while the freeze is still in
> effect.
>
> Can you please +1 this message
> Can you please +1 this message if you are happy to release or otherwise
> provide a substantial reason why we shouldn't.
+1
Polish team is ready for branching (excluding half-sleeping Milena;) )
> I will include a note with the release announcement explaining that this is
> a rush release and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim
I aggree with the early realease.
+1
Regards
Horst
Am 07.11.2010 13:16, schrieb Tim Sutton:
>
> Hi folks...
>
> We need to press ahead with the release as soon as possible.
>
> It would not be good to start the hackfest while the freeze is s
Hi folks...
We need to press ahead with the release as soon as possible.
It would not be good to start the hackfest while the freeze is still in
effect.
Can you please +1 this message if you are happy to release or otherwise
provide a substantial reason why we shouldn't.
I will include a note w
11 matches
Mail list logo
