Hi,
On Tue, 05. Nov 2013 at 13:37:12 +0100, Vincent Picavet wrote:
Does jan/may/sep sound preferable? feb/jun/oct or mar/jul/nov or
apr/aug/dec any better? Any preference on the week or weekday such a
release should happen (eg. 3rd friday of the month)?
Better not have a release in
+1 to feb/jun/oct for me.
- Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
I d try to avoid august and December due to many people having holidays.
jan/may/sep would coincide with the hack fest which might be sub optimal.
+1 for feb/jun/oct or mar/jul/nov
if we consider the hack fest in sept/april, then the feb schedule would
have the hackfest in the feature freeze
On 05-11-13 11:23, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Does jan/may/sep sound preferable? feb/jun/oct or mar/jul/nov or apr/aug/dec
any better? Any preference on the week or weekday such a release should
happen
(eg. 3rd friday of the month)?
Good plan! I do not care which three months, it will always
Hello,
Le mardi 5 novembre 2013 01:24:55, Nathan Woodrow a écrit :
It would be cool if we could do a Christmas release for 2.2 and then we can
look at things like multithreading for the next one. I don't think trying
to rush in something like multithreading is a good idea as there is a bit
Hi,
It would be fine for me to have another release by Christmas/end of the
year. In that case, of course the multi-threaded work should be done in
2.3
However, we should not postpone the multi-threaded work further. It is
core stuff and has a lot of implications. The longer we wait, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 05/11/2013 10:35, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
Hi,
Am 2013-11-05 10:29, schrieb Vincent Picavet:
+1 Release soon, release often.
+1
what is our brand new Release Manager say about this?
All the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 04. Nov 2013 at 20:01:02 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
wouldn't it a good time to do it now then? :)
My/The plan is to have a fixed release every four months.
So if we started with the last release the next release would be in january,
then may and september and so forth.
Hi Jürgen
Sounds good to have a fixed release schedule instead of waiting for
features ( that might eventually come ).
Things are more predictable with a fixed schedule. Additionally, with
releases every four months, it's not too bad if a feature needs to wait
until next release.
Regards,
Hi,
I agree with Jürgen and Marco, fixed release schedule is better than
waiting for features. Also having month for testing should be enough
for finding most major bugs/regressions, so releases will be more
stable and robust.
2013/11/5 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 04. Nov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 05/11/2013 12:24, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:
I agree with Jürgen and Marco, fixed release schedule is better
than waiting for features. Also having month for testing should be
enough for finding most major bugs/regressions, so releases will be
+1 from me for this kind of release schedule. Knowing that there is a
release coming in X months puts users minds at ease and lets devs focus on
what they can do and when, and not rushing things last minute.
Waiting for features is just asking for the we will just wait for this,
and that, and
Le mardi 5 novembre 2013 11:23:11, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit :
Anyway, the 4 months would be split into three months of development and
one month for testing, bugfixing, translating and release preparations in
a freeze period.
Great to have a fixed time release plan ! Definite +1 for that !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Do we have a definite plan for QGIS 2.2 release?
Thanks.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 04. Nov 2013 at 19:16:21 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Do we have a definite plan for QGIS 2.2 release?
Not yet - at least as far as I know.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 04/11/2013 19:51, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Not yet - at least as far as I know.
wouldn't it a good time to do it now then? :)
thanks.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I would like to see multi-threaded rendering in QGIS 2.2. Martin
Dobias could work on it. QGIS-CH could sponsor parts of it - but we
would need additional sponsors.
See these emails:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Marco Hugentobler is working on DXF export and there are also label
speed improvements in the pipeline that did not make it into 2.0
Nyall is working on improving the print composer to behave better like
a DTP/graphic application, including
As others have pointed out, there's already a substantial amount of new
features in qgis master. Beyond what was mentioned above, there's: world
file on qgis composer export, expression based {categorized, graduated}
symbology, notable improvements in the spatialite postegresql drivers,
expression based {categorized, graduated} symbology,
Which just need some fixing but seem to be working fine.
It would be cool if we could do a Christmas release for 2.2 and then we can
look at things like multithreading for the next one. I don't think trying
to rush in something like
20 matches
Mail list logo
