[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1391] Asistente LADM_COL approval notification.

Plugin Asistente LADM_COL approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1391] Asistente LADM_COL 0.0.5 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/asistente_ladm_col/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

Hey Carlo, Right I guess the first one is a package issue for unix type installs. On Windows this is fine as we can run different versions all the time but is a good point for Linux, etc. Regarding .qgis2 and .qgis3 This is already isolated in QGIS 3 as the settings and plugins are now all

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

> If you use > qgisMinimumVersion=3.0 > qgisMaximumVersion=3.99 > your plugin will only be visible in 3.x Hi Richard, Let me clarify: Usually you should only set the qgisMinimumVersion. If it is set to 3.0, it is assumed the plugin is compatible with any QGIS 3, thus from *2.99* up to *3.98*

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

Hi, On Sat, 03. Mar 2018 at 12:43:00 +0100, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) wrote: > but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires editing > abilities by plugins. Was that ever a goal? If so, I didn't know - but I have been around only for a bit more than 10 years ;)

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

@Nathan: Yes, to be precise, I mean calling using a different name, say qgis2 or qgis_ltr and using /usr/lib/libqgis2* instead of /usr/lib/libqgis*, /usr/lib/qgis2 or /usr/lib/qgis-ltr, /usr/share/qgis2, /usr/include/qgis2 instead of /usr/include/qgis, @Richard: That's very good, I overlooked

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

Hi > On 03 Mar 2018, at 20:43, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 03. Mar 2018 at 12:43:00 +0100, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) > wrote: >> but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires editing >> abilities by plugins. > > Was that ever a

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

No, it did come up, maybe on chat? Someone investigated (Richard?), but I can't remember what the outcome was. Tom - Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

On 03-03-18 08:33, Tim Sutton wrote: >> I'm not sure if it's an issue with my projecta account, but I can't >> access the "pending entries" page for 3.2. I get a "changelog.qgis.org >> >> redirected you too many times" error. >> >> Is this a known issue? > > > No its

[QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

>From a user's point of view, having a tried and dependable LTR is an important feature. The new main version has finally addressed the needed upgrade of python (2->3) and Qt (4->5) but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires editing abilities by plugins. Plugins are not

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

Hi, I'm not sure what you mean. Could you explain with an example. Regards, Nathan On 3 Mar. 2018 9:43 pm, "Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)" < carlo.berte...@gmail.com> wrote: > From a user's point of view, having a tried and dependable LTR is an > important feature. > The new main version

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Separate namespaces for QGIS-LTR and QGIS (3)

On 03-03-18 12:43, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) wrote: > From a user's point of view, having a tried and dependable LTR is an > important feature. > The new main version has finally addressed the needed upgrade of python > (2->3) and Qt (4->5) but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple >