Hi Alessandro,
Thanks a lot for these detailed insights!
On 04/17/2018 12:44 PM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to address all concerns in a single mail (what a challenge!)
>
> First I would like to say that everybody has access to a different set
> of "average/typical users" and I
Hi,
I'll try to address all concerns in a single mail (what a challenge!)
First I would like to say that everybody has access to a different set of
"average/typical users" and I cannot claim any statistical relevance to the
group of users I've been in touch with.
But the user's feedback that
jHi all,
to go in the same direction as Andreas, my opinion is that the three
relational widgets (value relation, relation reference, and 0-n/n-m one)
need some love and I was about to start redacting a global QEP for that.
There are a lot of features missing and glitches we would like to
Hi,
Yes indeed, there is a large overlap between the two and it would be
nice to unite them in the future.
Most of the recent work has gone into the relation reference widget, but
unfortunately there are still some things that will need to be
implemented on the relation reference widget before
Hi Nyall,
Interesting campaign and definitely some needed feature that will help
further improve forms in QGIS.
However, I wonder why you chose the "value relation widget" and not the
"relation reference widget". Both widget types have a larger overlap in
functionality and I did hope that we
