Re: [QGIS-Developer] New Processing Help System summary

Il 20/02/2018 00:27, Alexandre Neto ha scritto: > I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are > algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because > in sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names. OK, it makes sense. Thanks Nyall. -- Paolo Cavallini

Re: [QGIS-Developer] New Processing Help System summary

I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because in sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names. Nyall Dawson escreveu no dia segunda, 19/02/2018 às 22:40: > On 19 February 2018

Re: [QGIS-Developer] New Processing Help System summary

On 19 February 2018 at 18:09, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto: >> Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a >> summary of the current status list this! > > it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about

Re: [QGIS-Developer] New Processing Help System summary

Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto: > Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a > summary of the current status list this! it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about modules with names with spaces would be solved; Nyall, could the same approach you used

Re: [QGIS-Developer] New Processing Help System summary

Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a summary of the current status list this! I hope soon someone van figure out how to document the SAGA processing tools! Regards Tim > On 18 Feb 2018, at 16:30, matteo wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm