Re: [Qgis-developer] Documentation proposals - Was: Discussion on the QGIS grant proposals

[DelazJ]

Hi,

I'd like to resurrect this discussion, particularly about the PyCookbook
doc part.

It'd be nice if someone more aware of what's worth putting in the PyQGIS
doc can go through the issues reports in the doc repository and tag the
issues accordingly. Currently tickets are automatically created and not
labeled and the risk is that we document them in the user manual and
automatically close them ignoring they could/should be documented in the
cookbook.

So if any dev interested in the cookbook content can give it a look, it
will be a good step to the upcoming update of this doc (either for 2.18 or
3.x)

Thanks,
Harrissou

2016-10-16 8:48 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton :

> Hi
>
> On 10 Oct 2016, at 11:22 AM, Luigi Pirelli  wrote:
>
> 3) LTR will will terminate afgter 3.0 release and it's documentation
> will become strongly obsolete with 3.0 transition.
> For this reason I wouldn't invest in ltr pyqgis doc.
>
>
> Just a note that as I recall, our plan was for 3.2 to be the next LTR (so
> 2.14 will probably have a 16month life as LTR).
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> Luigi Pirelli
>
> 
> **
> * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> * Mastering QGIS:
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
> 
> **
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *Tim Sutton*
> QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
> t...@qgis.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Documentation proposals - Was: Discussion on the QGIS grant proposals

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

> On 10 Oct 2016, at 11:22 AM, Luigi Pirelli  wrote:
> 
> 3) LTR will will terminate afgter 3.0 release and it's documentation
> will become strongly obsolete with 3.0 transition.
> For this reason I wouldn't invest in ltr pyqgis doc.

Just a note that as I recall, our plan was for 3.2 to be the next LTR (so 2.14 
will probably have a 16month life as LTR).

Regards

Tim

> 
> Luigi Pirelli
> 
> **
> * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli 
> 
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli 
> 
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir 
> * Mastering QGIS:
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis 
> 
> **
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer 
> 
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer 
> 



---

Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
t...@qgis.org




___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Documentation proposals - Was: Discussion on the QGIS grant proposals

[Luigi Pirelli]

On 8 October 2016 at 22:13, Anita Graser  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Neumann, Andreas 
> wrote:
>>
>> Now, the documentation items:
>>
>> 1) 2.16 Documentation
>>
>> 16) PyQGIS Developer Cookbook update and maintenance
>>
>> 15) PyQGIS Cookbook Review
>>
>
> Do we already have a plan how to proceed with the documentation items? I'd
> suggest a focus on LTR docs for end users as well as PyQGIS. What do you
> think?

really hard to decide about LTR PyQGIS... probably a community poll
can be useful with a (short term) discussion. My reason to explain why
it is hard to decide are:
1) I would invest and push developer to dev and port 3.0 plugins
2) pyqgis dev knowledge is almost covered also by StackExchange... I
agree that wouldn't be the way to document, but we are facing
transition to 3
3) LTR will will terminate afgter 3.0 release and it's documentation
will become strongly obsolete with 3.0 transition.
For this reason I wouldn't invest in ltr pyqgis doc.

Luigi Pirelli

**
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Documentation proposals - Was: Discussion on the QGIS grant proposals

[DelazJ]

Hi,
LTR docs? Is there any new LTR already scheduled? afaics, 2.14 has its doc
released.

That said, yes, there were nice plans among the grant applications we
should keep and help realise.

Regards,
Harrissou

2016-10-08 22:13 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser :

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Neumann, Andreas 
> wrote:
>
>> Now, the documentation items:
>>
>> ​1)​ 2.16 Documentation
>>
>> ​​16)​ PyQGIS Developer Cookbook update and maintenance
>>
>> 15)​ PyQGIS Cookbook Review
>>
>> They add up in total to € 14k. I believe that all of the three  deserve
>> to be supported financially. We have budgeted 10k € in 2016 for
>> documentation and PyQT documentation. 1.5k € have been spent so far. So
>> still 8.5k remaining. Together with the new 2017 budget I believe that all
>> of the three above items can be easily handled outside of the QGIS grants
>> program.
>>
>
> ​Do we already have a plan how to proceed with the documentation items?
> ​I'd suggest a focus on LTR docs for end users as well as PyQGIS. What do
> you think?
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer