Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-04-02 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Idan, On Sun, 02. Apr 2017 at 13:55:08 +0300, Idan Miara wrote: > Shouldn't it say PR in the following line? > LTR 2.18.7 2.14.15 19.05.2017 20 4 No, starting with 2.18.7 2.18 will be tagged LTR. Not changing much otherwise as 2.18 will continue to be the LR. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-04-02 Thread DelazJ
Hi, Yes, good catch. Fixed in https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/commit/e38b8c09d51f6ba4d082fb4063f9b33ab7cbf874 Thanks Idan, Harrissou 2017-04-02 12:55 GMT+02:00 Idan Miara : > Hi, > > Shouldn't it say PR in the following line? > LTR 2.18.7 2.14.15 19.05.2017 20 4 > > On 1

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-04-02 Thread Idan Miara
Hi, Shouldn't it say PR in the following line? LTR 2.18.7 2.14.15 19.05.2017 20 4 On 1 April 2017 at 12:11, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Harrissou, > > On Fri, 31. Mar 2017 at 21:53:33 +0200, DelazJ wrote: > > #. 3.0 will be a LTR (actually from 3.0.9 - nine months after first

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-04-02 Thread DelazJ
Hi Jürgen, Thanks for the fix and explanation. Regards, Harrissou Le samedi 1 avril 2017, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit : > Hi Harrissou, > > On Fri, 31. Mar 2017 at 21:53:33 +0200, DelazJ wrote: >> #. 3.0 will be a LTR (actually from 3.0.9 - nine months after first >> release?) > >

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-03-31 Thread DelazJ
Hi, I came across reading QGIS release schedule at http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap. html#release-schedule and wonder if that really reflects the decision that was taken. The online roadmap exposed that: #. 3.0 will be a LTR (actually from 3.0.9 - nine months after first

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Matthias Kuhn wrote: > I think having 2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended > period is a good thing (...) but with a clear deadline for 2.18 so we are > not stuck in the 2 release series forever. and Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > When a new LTR is released we have a period where

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Harrissou, On Wed, 22. Feb 2017 at 15:22:11 +0100, DelazJ wrote: > I think there usually (ok! it happens only once) is an overlap between two > LT releases: 2.8 was maintained few months after 2.14 (I think it was > stopped when 2.16 was released). Yes. We build for two package repositories.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Personally I would like to see a 3.x release become LTR as soon as possible. 3.0 should be skipped because despite it's incredibly high stability there could potentially still be problems. So the next in line is 3.2. I think having 2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended period is

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Borys Jurgiel
It's an option, too. The question is which one is supposed to be more mature, stable and polished: 3.2.5 or 3.4.0. Anyway, in both cases the lifetime of 2.18 LTR seems to be clear now. Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2017 15:22:11 DelazJ pisze: > Hi, > > I think there usually (ok! it happens only once)

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread DelazJ
Hi, I think there usually (ok! it happens only once) is an overlap between two LT releases: 2.8 was maintained few months after 2.14 (I think it was stopped when 2.16 was released) - http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html So following that logic, 3.2 would be released in

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2017 14:45:07 Borys Jurgiel pisze: > Other options would be: retire 2.18 LTR in January 2018 or postpone 3.2 > until June 2018. Both look unacceptable for me. I mean to* me of course - they look to me, not 'unacceptable for me'. I'm sorry :) Regards, Borys

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-22 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Tim Sutton said: > Personally I was hoping for 2.18 LTR to last from June 2017 to June 2018 > and then releasing 3.2 In June 2018. > > * retire 2.14 in June 2017 > * 2.18 becomes LTR from June 2017 to ​**​*June*** ​2018 > * 3.0 feature freeze in July 2017 > * release 3.0 in Sept 2017 > * release

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-21 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Borys Jurgiel wrote: > Hi, > > Dnia wtorek, 21 lutego 2017 14:49:14 Tim Sutton pisze: > > ​Just to confirm what Paolo said, the issue was raised by Paolo at our > PSC > > meeting 2 months ago (all meeting minutes are publicly available

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-21 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Hi, Dnia wtorek, 21 lutego 2017 14:49:14 Tim Sutton pisze: > ​Just to confirm what Paolo said, the issue was raised by Paolo at our PSC > meeting 2 months ago (all meeting minutes are publicly available at > https://github.com/qgis/qgis/wiki#psc-meeting-minutes) Unfortunately the last meeting is

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-21 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Vincent Picavet (ml) < vincent...@oslandia.com> wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Please excuse me if I missed something, but I am quite surprised, not by > the decisions themselves, but the process of these decisions. > > I have seen no call for meeting, no message to

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-21 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 21/02/2017 09:25, Vincent Picavet (ml) ha scritto: > The topic is really important and has deep consequences for all of our > users, funders, developers. The least we can do is ask them for their > advice and feedback. Hi Vincent, we had a quick meeting among people who is doing most of the

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-21 Thread Vincent Picavet (ml)
Hi Paolo, Please excuse me if I missed something, but I am quite surprised, not by the decisions themselves, but the process of these decisions. I have seen no call for meeting, no message to the list to gather advices, no mention to voting members neither of this IRC meeting happening. The

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-20 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Hi, Il 20/02/2017 11:59, DelazJ ha scritto: > * retire 2.14 in June 2017 > * 2.18 becomes LTR from June 2017 to 2018 > * 3.0 feature freeze in July 2017 > * release 3.0 in Sept 2017 > * release 3.2 as next LTR in release 3.0 + 4 Months (eta June 2018). > > You mean 3.2

Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases

2017-02-20 Thread DelazJ
Hi Paolo (and all) 2017-02-20 11:17 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini : > Hi all, > during a fast and productive IRC meeting today we have come out with a > proposal for the management of current and future versions of QGIS: > > Thanks to you > * retire 2.14 in June 2017 > *