Hi,
I would prefere another solution instead of changing the releases. The
documentation team is in the same situation. We are always behind the
releases, but the problem I see is that there are not enough people working
on the documents. At the moment we were not even able to start updating the
Andre Joost wrote
Am 18.07.2014 11:31, schrieb Pedro:
Even after simplified the geometries I still don't see the layer.
I must be doing some very basic mistake
Can you please look at the screenshots from my first post and see if
there
is something wrong;
I don't see anything
Andre Joost wrote
Am 18.07.2014 11:31, schrieb Pedro:
Even after simplified the geometries I still don't see the layer.
I must be doing some very basic mistake
Can you please look at the screenshots from my first post and see if
there
is something wrong;
I don't see anything
Hi Otto,
You make some excellent points. Just to follow on one of them:
But usually customers and developers don't think about also spending
an additional
little amount to document the feature in the QGIS docs and training
material.
I think that's a QGIS problem. I know when I get quotes for
+1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training materials
should coordinate and help the core QGIS documentation (both the manual and
the training manual) improve.
The solution is very simple: Require up to date, accurate documentation
for all commits of new features. This is
+ 1 to Otto and Victor.
Developers should develop, the can document some aspects of
code/feature (and they
already do this!) but we can not ask them to write manuals
2014-07-22 13:01 GMT+03:00 Victor Olaya vola...@gmail.com:
+1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training
Il 22/07/2014 13:21, Jonathan Moules ha scritto:
Fair point, but then I'd ask - what would the cost be? Is it not something
that can
be covered by the current sponsorship given that a significant (or maybe just
significantly vocal ;-) ) portion of the community seems to be interested in
I confirm this. On the Advanced Interface, the GRASS commands all appear
to be fine, but anything under GRASS GIS 7 commands fails with a wall of
Python error:
An error has occured while executing Python code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Hi, Paolo,
sorry for my late answer.
Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
color ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
I can put a feat. req., please confirm if this is your thought.
Regards
João
2014-07-21 6:24 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini
Il 22/07/2014 15:03, João Gaspar ha scritto:
Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
color
ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
I can put a feat. req., please confirm if this is your thought.
exactly.
thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi
ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
João
2014-07-22 14:03 GMT+01:00 João Gaspar joao.f.r.gas...@gmail.com:
Hi, Paolo,
sorry for my late answer.
Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
color ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
I can
Il 22/07/2014 15:08, João Gaspar ha scritto:
ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
better choose one, to avoid the drunkman syndrome ;)
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
___
Ahahah,
DONE
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10925
2014-07-22 14:10 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 22/07/2014 15:08, João Gaspar ha scritto:
ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
better choose one, to avoid the drunkman syndrome ;)
--
Paolo Cavallini -
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Otto Dassau das...@gbd-consult.de wrote:
a) Trainers could combine their forces and prepair general training
materials
together that everybody can use and extend. All tools and the document
basis
is available and provided by QGIS project in the
Am 22.07.2014 11:22, schrieb Pedro:
It´s exactly that, the file generated by the OGR2Layers only open the qgis
layer correctly in Firefox!
With IE or Chrome I can never see the qgis layer.
It's a limitation in the plugin but it works.
If you search for OpenLayers Internet Explorer, you will
Is it a common practice for developer to fill feature requests for
Documentation and help whenever they create new features? This would still
free developers to keep creating good stuff, and help others to keep track
of what needs attention in Docs. Using the visual changelog and scrolling
Am 22.07.2014, 12:16 Uhr, schrieb Derek Hohls dho...@csir.co.za:
Is it not possible to require an absolutely minimum entry, at the
correct place in the docs, for a new feature? For example, if a
developer adds a new function X to a list of existing functions,
already documented in
Hi,
I don't think splitting development resources to maintain an LTS branch is
going to solve the real issues. In fact, it will probably just cause more.
It seems to me that it all boils down to needing more time between releases:
* Documentation and development teams need to work more together
Hi All,
It is hard to figure out where in the conversation to interject but
Victors counter-suggestion appears appropriate to me.
Being involved in several open source projects, creating tutorials for
these and having in the past been involved with trying to contribute to
the main
Hi
I am new here, but in trouble with Qgis.
I have a BAD problem with decimal numbers in shapefile attribute tables.
My set:
Ubuntu Linux 12.04
Qgis 2.2
Locale FI
Example:
The original number in attribute table is: 342,52189242800
Using binary editor I can see, that the internal format in
Hi!
Is it possible to provide the shapefile somewhere to take a closer look at it?
regards
Werner
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Hakala Oiva (MTT) oiva.hak...@mtt.fi wrote:
Hi
I am new here, but in trouble with Qgis.
I have a BAD problem with decimal numbers in shapefile attribute tables.
21 matches
Mail list logo
