kmithoefer wrote
Thanks a lot! i understand the problem now. I will create a custom
projection.
It might be more convenient to do an affine transformation, deducting
3200 (32 million) from the easting of each vertex in the shapefile. The
QGIS Vector Affine plug-in can do this.
Nick.
Dear all,
I have a problem transforming shape files based on Gauss-Krueger 3 (EPSG
31467) to ETRS 89 UTM32N (EPSG 25832). The problem is the eastern value.
It has only 6 instead of 8 digits, the first two numbers are missing in
ETRS system (e.g. 570873 instead of 32 570873). Could anyone
Dear all,
I have a problem transforming shape files based on Gauss-Krueger 3 (EPSG
31467) to ETRS 89 UTM32N (EPSG 25832). The problem is the eastern value.
It has only 6 instead of 8 digits, the first two numbers are missing in
ETRS system (e.g. 570873 instead of 32 570873). Could anyone
Dear Klaus,
the transformation is correct. EPSG:25832 is defined without the leading
UTM-Zone (32) as the zone is part of the projection's description. At
least ome German Bundesländer however put the 32 into their ETRS89
data (no ides why, thus there is no EPSG-code you can use for these
Bernhard
Shouldn't the false easting in the custom CRS be 32.500.000 ? The normal
false easting for UTM is 500.000. The 32.000.000 must be added to
this value.
Regards
Bo Victor Thomsen
Aestas-GIS
Denmark
Den 28-08-2012 10:58, Bernhard Ströbl skrev:
Dear Klaus,
the transformation is
Dear Bernhard,
Thanks a lot! i understand the problem now. I will create a custom
projection.
With regards
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Transforming-Gauss-Krueger-3-to-ETRS-89-UTM32N-tp4998294p4998307.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - User
