Hi,
I am trying to better understand the rule based renderer.
Which version is correct?
a) QGIS is rendering all features of the first rule, then the second
rule, etc, Features of the first rule are rendered first, features of
the second rule on top of features from the first rule
b) QGIS is
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to better understand the rule based renderer.
Which version is correct?
a) QGIS is rendering all features of the first rule, then the second rule,
etc, Features of the first rule are rendered first,
Hi Martin,
Thank you for the explanation. I believe that a) option is more natural
to users. But of course we would also need a way to later change the
order of the rules - once they are created.
For now I am just using additional layers until the rule-based renderer
behaves like a) or SLD.
Hi,
Is their a list somewhere which shows all of the rendering rules which
people are using (the beginings of a standards system)?
Thanks,
Sam
On 4/8/11, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net
wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to
It would make sense for very well-known datasets with a fixed
structure. Potential candidates are national survey datasets that are
widely used or OpenStreetMap data.
In my case, the rendering rules are very specific to my own data
structure. It wouldn't make sense to share them.
Andreas
Ok,
I ask as i am making my own set of rules/standards for the CommonMap
API (which works the same as OpenStreetMap) accept the licence of the
data is ccBY, instead of ccBYsa/Odbl.
So the source datasets begin with Natural Earth, GeoBase (Canada),
CanVec (Canada), TIGER (USA), LINZ (New Zealand)
It sounds like that the USGS DLG might be better suited than Tiger, though
it is outdated. The DLG is a more similar product type to the LINZ topo and
Canvec stuff.
DLG is being replaced by the nationalmap.gov stuff - see products and
services on left side, as well as ustopo (which uses data from
wrote:
From: Mike msw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Understanding the rule-based renderer
To: Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com
Cc: qgis-user qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Received: Friday, April 8, 2011, 11:04 AM
It sounds like that the USGS DLG might be better suited than Tiger
data over TIGER. However, for roads and a
number of other things (like county and municipal boundaries, urban POIs,
etc.), I'd vote for TIGER.
Dan
--- On *Fri, 4/8/11, Mike msw...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Mike msw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Understanding the rule-based renderer
